I WILL NOT DIE BUT LIVE June 2017
I WILL NOT DIE BUT LIVE
Content
- Childhood
and Teenage Challenges
2.
A
young Teacher and Missionary
3.
A
Theological Student in District Six
4.
Back in Germany!
- An Anti-Apartheid Activist
- Continued Activism
7. Skirmishes in Church Ranks
8. Activism for racial
Reconciliation
9. Uncompassionate Activism
10. Leaving our Jerusalem?
11. Employment Instability … and Blessing
12. Fighting Communism and Islam
13. Movement on the Mission Front
14. Africa beckons
15.
Missionary Preparation
16. Missionaries at last!
17.
Swimming against the Stream
18. Whippings as a Blessing
19. A Global Impact from the Cape
20. Divine Nudges towards an
Increase of Prayer in the City
21. Descendants of the biblical Isaac and Ishmael Highlighted
22. The
Isaiah 19 Prayer Room comes into being
23. Time to Apologize?
Appendix - A fresh breeze is
blowing
Foreword
Through my studies and research I discerned that the establishment and
spread of Islam in general - and very much so also in South Africa - could be
described as the unpaid debt of the Church. The feeling of guilt became even
stronger when I discovered to my dismay that there was hardly any doctrinal tenet in
Islam which had not been derived from the bickering of Christians in the
centuries prior to the establishment and rise of Islam. At a later stage the
theological ‘debt‘ towards Jews (and Judaism) came back very strongly. [1] I deemed it high time that we
as Christians should start attempting to paying off at least some of this ‘debt‘.
Very much inspired by the Stuttgart Confession of 1945, I considered writing a rather lengthy ‘open letter’ a number of years
ago when I was very strongly impressed by the guilt of Church theologians. The Stuttgart
Confession of Guilt was issued by the council of the
Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD)
on 18/19 October, 1945 (The historical roots of the Stuttgart Confession go back to the period following World War I.)
The declaration itself, as a confession of guilt, enabled a new beginning for
the Evangelical Church in Germany and
for the German nation at large after 1945.)
The question was: how could I
convey the need for confession to the global Church in respect of Islam? The
idea of an open letter was birthed. After some time I decided to drop the
concept when I could not discern any good avenue to channel such a confession.
Another part of the background
of this book is my own attempts since 1978 to get Dutch Reformed Church leaders in South Africa to do something
similar. Two professors of theology, Willie Jonker and Johan Heyns, were among
those with whom I interacted. Therefore I was blessed to hear of the role of
the former in confessing that apartheid was a heresy at the Rustenburg
meeting of church leaders in November 1990. (Delegates from 97 denominations
had gathered there. That conference sent signals of reconciliation throughout
the land, ushering in our democratic era.) Prof. Heyns would become a major catalyst for change
in the Dutch Reformed Church and
ultimately becoming a martyr, assassinated in November 1994 probably because of
his role in that process.
It is nevertheless my
thoroughly considered opinion that remorseful confession by Church leaders for
the establishment and spread of the problematic Islamic ideology is needed,
rather than the slamming of the religion. This should ideally be followed up by
concrete steps of restitution.
The
first draft of this book - initially written as an ‘open letter’ - was still on
my computer when I had a biopsy for prostate cancer. At that time – on 8
October 2003 to be exact – I was encouraged by the ‘Watchword’, as the
Moravians have been traditionally calling the 'Old Testament' Scripture for the
day: ‘I will not die but live and proclaim what the LORD has done’ (Psalm
118:17). This became the cue for me not
only to update the ‘open letter’, but also to change the original title - My
spiritual Odyssey - to the present one, namely I will not die but live.
God’s Word obviously had to get pre-eminence over Greek mythology. My wife Rosemarie nudged me to get some order
in my writing efforts, saying something like “If anything would happen to you,
all your years of writing and research would have been in vain”. I could not disagree with this view. I knew that I should
at least try and finish some of the manuscripts that were incomplete. Concretely, I discerned in the word from Scripture an
invitation and summons to attempt finalising manuscripts.[2]
The first
draft of I will not die but live was already
finished by November 2003. During the
post-operative period in Kingsbury Hospital at the beginning of December 2003, after the removal of my
cancerous prostate gland, more progress followed with various manuscripts. Because Search
for Truth 2 was more or less complete already, I proceeded to get that
printed.
The
death of our revered President Nelson Mandela in December 2013 brought back
many memories. It also inspired me to make our love story available in hard
copy for our grandchildren. This kick started the low-key publication of WHAT GOD JOINED TOGETHER in 2015. The present book is in some sense a follow-up of WHAT GOD JOINED TOGETHER. I am like-wise attempting to tell (the rest of) my story to my
grandchildren. Naturally some repetition cannot be avoided.
I continued working on I will not die but
live
in November 2015. However, other material
kept me busy throughout the bulk of 2016. Once again I will not die but
live was more or less
forgotten.
Towards
the end of 2016 I
resumed improving Honger na Geregtigheid (Hunger after Justice), a manuscript which our
daughter Tabitha had scanned in from a cyclostyled A4 version a few years ago.
(During such a process the original text gets quite distorted, needing
substantial correction.) On 29
December 2016 I discovered to my dismay that some pages of the scanned
version of Honger na Geregtigheid were missing.
When I went to try and find a better copy of Honger na Geregtigheid - searching for the missing pages in our
garage in a carton that we had almost dumped - I found the first printed draft of I will not die but live. (Psalm 118:17 had been the
challenge that I was given in 2003.) I sensed some rebuke. I had to proclaim what the
LORD has done and stop harping on the
negative activism of Honger na Geregtigheid.
On my 71st birthday on New Year’s Eve 2016 a relative who had
no clue of all this, felt an inner urge to give to me as a special word for the
occasion Psalm 71:18 (Even when I am old and gray, do not forsake me, my God,
till I declare your power to the next generation, your mighty acts to all who
are to come).
I perceived this as confirmation to press on towards publishing I will
not die but live, i.e. to proclaim
what the LORD has done’.
One will find the biblical Jonah mentioned in this book quite frequently.
The reason for this is that I took much of the material from the autobiographical
manuscript I was like Jonah. As in all my other
manuscripts and books, I refer to my race as 'Coloured'. In a country as ours
where racial classifications has caused such damage, I am aware that the
designation 'Coloured' has given
offence to the group into which I have been classified. For this reason, I attempt to put ‘Coloured’
consistently between inverted commas and with a capital C when I refer to the
racial group. To the other races I refer as 'Black' and 'White' respectively,
with a capital B and W, to denote that it is not normal colours that are being
described.
Cape Town, June 2017
- Childhood and
Teenage Challenges
I take liberty to introduce myself as a ‘Cape
Coloured’, who has been living among Capetonian Muslims for a number of years. Growing up as a little boy in the slum area of Cape
Town called District Six in the late 1940s and early 1950s I had no idea
that District Six was the hub of resistance against all forms of racial
segregation.[3]
Soon
after coming to personal faith in Jesus as my Saviour in September 1961, I thought as a teenager that the
most effective opposition to the heretical apartheid ideology would be to
assemble followers of Jesus from different racial and denominational backgrounds
as often as possible - to demonstrate Christian unity in this way. The disunity of the Body of Christ would bug
me for many decades.
The old District Six – a cultural Conglomerate
I was born in St Monica’s Maternity Clinic in Bo-Kaap[4]
just over 70 years ago and bred as an Afrikaans-speaking Moravian Christian in the hey‑day of District Six. I attended the Zinzendorf Primary School in Arundel
Street when there were still quite a few Jewish shop owners in Hanover Street,
the hub of the slum-like suburb. (I learned later that many Jews were actually
living in District Six.)
At a later stage of
my life, I enjoyed my theological education at the Moravian Seminary in Ashley Street ‑ likewise in District Six ‑ at
a time when many buildings of the cherished environment of my childhood had
already been demolished, all the Jews had left and many Christians had (been)
moved to the Cape Flats. (District Six was declared a ‘White’ residential area on 11 February 1966
by governmental decree. The Jews of District Six had moved voluntarily to
‘White’ residential suburbs like Sea Point and Vredehoek.)
An Errand Boy in Elim As a retired Moravian school principal and
minister, my grandfather, Oupa Joorst, asked my parents from the Elim
Mission Station whether I could come and help them as a ‘stuurding’.
As an errand boy I was required to fetch water, go to the shop for them and
empty the toilet buckets (together with another boy I had to carry the bucket
to a big hole that were dug twice every day outside the village.)
On the mission station
quite an amount of Gospel seed was sown into my heart in various ways. The
memorizing of Bible verses would come in good stead in later years. A special
Scripture portion was the first verses of Isaiah 53. We had to memorise how the
prophet wrote about an unknown suffering person who was compared with a lamb
taken to be slaughtered. I understood this as a prophecy about Jesus as the
Lamb of God. He, the Lamb, did not open His mouth when He was falsely accused.
Towards
the end of February 1958 ‘Oupa Joorst’ became very ill. The doctor stated that
he would not live very long. When I returned from school for the noon break on
8 March 1958, I went straight to Oupa’s bedroom, where the neighbour,
Ta’ Stienie Daniels, tried to push me out of the room, but it was too late! She
could not stop me experiencing something very special! I was privileged to see
the radiant joy on the face of the aged saint going ‘home’. He evidently saw
something which nobody else of us at his bedside saw. He stretched out his arms
expectantly, as if he was being fetched, with his face lighting up for a
moment. And then it was all over... This left an indelible mark on me as I saw
that Oupa obviously rejoiced to be
‘taken’ along by some celestial being unseen by the rest of us.
Changes in Tiervlei
The situation back home in Tiervlei
changed when our Dad had lost his job as a blocker at a milliner factory where
they produced female hats. After Daddy had become unemployed in 1957, no
factory in the clothing industrial union was inclined to employ a middle-aged
worker on top wages. Mommy took employment as nanny of the children of a
Professor Beinart from UCT.
Even when Daddy eventually did get work as a night porter
at Mupine, the hostel for workers of the insurance company Old Mutual, the
total earnings were still not sufficient. My parents saw no other way out than
to take our sister Magdalene out of school as the eldest of the four siblings.
A clear
Faith Challenge
For my secondary schooling I returned to
Tiervei. Mr. Braam, our English-speaking Vasco
High School principal who hailed from Methodist stock, was God’s instrument
for giving us as learners a clear challenge. That he could say with such
emphasis in the weekly assembly time ‘Blessed assurance, Jesus is mine’,
struck at my deepest emotions. I lacked that inner assurance.
I was
still a fifteen-year-old teenager when my close friend Nicholas Dirks invited
me along to the Goodwood Showgrounds on Sunday 17 September 1961 where a
Canadian, Dr Oswald Smith, was the preacher. Quite dynamically the evangelist
challenged everybody during the service to ‘come to the Cross.’ For the first
time in my life I realized that it was not good enough to know in a general way
that Jesus died for the sins of the world. I responded positively, accepting
Jesus as my personal Saviour. There was sadly no follow up discipling. (This
had happened at two previous similar occasions.) I had an inner peace which was
completely different this time.
My Ways are not
your Ways...
During 1962 our mother had to stop working
because of arthritis, aggravated by the factory work where she had to be on her
feet all day. I matriculated at the end of that year, with the understanding
that I could proceed with my teacher training after a break of a year. In the
interim I would take any employment that I could find.
After a few unsuccessful attempts at trying to get clerical work (that was
as a rule more or less reserved for ‘Whites’), I settled for a menial job at
the printing factory of Nasionale Boekhandel, where I was required to
clean the machines.
Returning to our Tiervlei home from
the Nasionale Boekhandel printing works in nearby Parow in the late
afternoon of early January 1963, I learned that I had been accepted as a
teacher trainee at the prestigious Hewat Training
College in Crawford.
I was pleasantly surprised when my parents disclosed that they felt that
I could go to ‘Hewat’ straight away, thus without the gap year of secular
employment. They had been challenged by the ‘Watchword’ from the Moravian textbook
for the day, Isaiah 55:8: For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your
ways my ways, declares the Lord....
After a short period of gradual
spiritual backsliding ‑ while I nevertheless remained active in church youth
work ‑ God used Ds. Piet Bester, an
Afrikaner Dutch Reformed pastor, who came to Tiervlei in 1962 (The ‘Coloured’ sector of Tiervlei was later
renamed Ravensmead) to show me that I was ‘addicted’ to sports. I
was deeply challenged because sports had become the equivalent of an idol to
me. Dominee (Reverend) Piet Bester’s
testimony of his deliverance from folk dancing pierced my heart: ‘Was I actually
idolizing sport?’ I was set free from that addiction on that day.
An ecclesiastical Misfit
In our church I did
not fit the mould. Along with two young Sunday School colleagues with the name
Paul who had the typical Cape Moravian surnames Engel and Joemat,[5] I
would often launch out in an arrogant way to ‘get the Moravian Church back
on track’ with regard to biblical conversion. The two Pauls and I sometimes
used unconventional means. Bible choruses were regarded as sectarian in those
days.
At the youth services in our local church
I went a step further than my sister Magdalene. I also invited not only experienced (lay)
preachers from other denominations, but also teenagers like myself to come and
preach. Attie Louw, who was with me in our Matric class, had contacts via the Christian Students Association (CSV). (The
Lord used him to bring new life into the CSV of our school. Attie subsequently proceeded
to become a dominee, a Dutch Reformed
minister.) He came to preach at one of our youth services and he also
recommended his theological student colleague Allan Boesak, who had started
preaching already when he was ten years old.
Allan came to preach in our fellowship soon after he had
started with his theological studies. Coming from what we regarded as far away
Somerset West, Allan slept at our home the Saturday evening ahead of the youth
service the following day. This gave me a good opportunity for some theological
discussion. I eagerly grabbed the occasion to sound Allan out about the
christening of infants. (On the issue of
believer’s baptism a Pentecostal friend had been influencing me.)
Allan couldn’t really convince me, but I was satisfied
that he was honest, that he believed that christening of infants is the sign of the new covenant that our Lord had
ushered in. This was the equivalent and substitute for the Jewish ritual of circumcision.
He explained that the latter is the visible sign of the old covenant of God
with Israel.
A Challenge to
Mission Work
God used Ds. Bester, the new local Sendingkerk minister not only
interested in sharing the Gospel with all and sundry, but also in missions. As
part of a new commitment to the Lord, I abruptly decided to stop playing
cricket for Tigers, the local club. I attended the Dutch Reformed Sendingkerk now quite regularly on Sunday and on Wednesday evenings.
The next few years were
formative in my spiritual development. Here my faith was really built up and a
basis laid for involvement in missionary work. Since I was racially classified
and raised as a ‘Coloured’, I however never even considered remotely that I
would ever go to another country for missional purposes. We thought that
missionaries had to be ‘White’. Soon enough I got involved in local mission
work.
Mission Work in
Rebellion
In the Sunday school of our congregation, I had led a
few children to a personal faith in Jesus as their Saviour. I also encouraged
the children to tell others about their decision to follow Jesus. One of the
children from the Sonnenberg family did just this at their home. The staunch
Moravian parents promptly complained to the church leadership about the
'un-Moravian' way in which I was conducting the Sunday School classes. To get
‘converted’ to faith in Jesus was regarded to be sectarian by the rank and file
Moravian Church member at the Cape, also on the mission stations.
(Sadly, our denomination had thus drifted far away from its blessed
evangelistic and missionary beginnings.)
When I
was called to book, I was not prepared to budge, deciding to rather stop with Sunday
school teaching there. This typified the defiant, rebellious and arrogant
spirit of that era of my life. I went to serve as a volunteer at a small open air Wayside Sunday School in
someone’s backyard.
I served as a volunteer at a small open air Wayside Sunday School in
someone’s backyard.
Spiritually revived
A link through Paul Engel (my rebel teenage colleague of the Moravian Church) and Allan Boesak separately
brought me to a major turning point in my life. They invited me to the
evangelistic outreach of the Christian
Students’ Association at the seaside resort of Harmony Park. That was due
to start just after Christmas in 1964.
At that time however, I
felt spiritually empty and bankrupt. How could one go and share the Gospel with
others in such a condition? I cried to the Lord to equip me! He heard my
heart’s cry, divinely touching me. I sensed the power of the Holy Spirit taking
hold of me. I was thus better equipped for the outreach there in Harmony Park,
taking that evangelistic zeal into my first teaching post at Bellville South High School!
A special friendship and partnership developed there in Harmony Park with
my evangelical tent mates David Savage and Ds. Esau Jacobs (the latter was
generally known as Jakes). I corresponded thereafter quite intensely with both
of them. (At that time Jakes was a young
pastor who had just started off in his first congregation, in the Transkei,
residing in Umtata.)
After one of the Harmony Park open air evening services I received my
introduction to ‘spiritual warfare’. When Jakes entered the tent after he had a
long conversation with a Muslim camper, he exclaimed despondently that we would
not be able to make any head‑way without prayer and fasting in outreach to
Muslims. Next to Ds. Piet Bester, Jakes,
the young pastor, became my role model and mentor for the next few years. Over
time our friendship grew into a David and Jonathan relationship.
Unity
in Christ across the racial Divide?
The Harmony Park evangelistic outreach influenced my life in yet another
way: There I received an urge to network with people from different church
backgrounds, more than before.
I
naively tried to break through the unwritten prescripts of our society with
regard to racial separation. I was looking at all sorts of ways to express the
unity in Christ across the racial divide. (My only opposition to the apartheid
regime until this time was the occasional disregard of petty apartheid sign
boards such as the prohibition to go through the ‘Whites only’ subway at
Crawford station in the afternoons, along with my Hewat Training College student colleagues. We were always careful however that there were
no railway policemen around who could arrest us.)
Trained for the Ministry?
As I went into my
final year of teacher training - in those days two years of such training were
the norm - I did not feel comfortable and capable at all to go and teach straight
away the following year. I still looked like a juvenile myself. I feared that
the learners would run over me.
(My ID card, which one
coul receive after turning 16)
While I was still a
teenager, the above‑mentioned Chris Wessels, who was by this time an assistant
pastor in the Moravian Church, challenged me to enter theological training.
However, I hoped to be more clearly and divinely called. When I was due to start
my teaching career, I felt also that I should be trained for the ministry. But
I sensed no peace to follow a ‘call’ to the Moravian
Theological Seminary at that point in
time. Therefore I applied to do a third year of teacher training.
That was the big exception for ‘Coloureds’ at the time. This excuse was very
handy when our Church Board offered me a teaching post in Port Elizabeth,
albeit with the proviso that I would also attend the extra-mural theological
seminary classes there.
I was not opposed to theological training
as such. In fact, before my conversion to Christ I had already envisaged myself
as a teacher and preacher simultaneously. That was quite customary among our
relatives. (My grandfather and a few uncles had been practising two professions
simultaneously - as a school principal and church pastor.)
Pushed into Teaching
Quite surprisingly, the third year “academic” teachers’ training course
at Hewat for 1965 was cancelled. Thus I had to try and find one of the
rare primary school teaching posts. (For ‘Coloureds’ there were far too few
school buildings. Many of the township schools had two teaching shifts for the
lower classes, one in the morning and another one starting around 1 p.m.)
Very unbalanced
With an evangelistic
team of Ds. Bester I got engaged in one evangelistic initiative after the
other. The evangelist Chris Cronje from Springs in the Transvaal was a
favourite speaker in these public campaigns. The conviction had grown within me
in the meantime that I should experience a clear call from the Lord before diving
into theological studies.
After my encounter with
the Lord before my first Harmony Park beach outreach, I started to attend the
prayer meetings every Sunday morning at six o’clock at the Moria Sendingkerk
of Tiervlei.
One Sunday morning a
mini-revival erupted there when suddenly everybody started praying simultaneously.
That was quite revolutionary for the time, causing some disquiet among the
traditional reformed believers. It was significant that women from different local
churches were meeting each other regularly for prayer hereafter. This confirmed
for me the special blessing of united prayer across denominational barriers. (Years
later we would put this to good effect in Zeist (Holland) in the 1980s and back
in Cape Town after our return in 1992.)
Yet, I was also very much a child of
my surroundings and completely unbalanced. Not long before starting my teaching
career, I frowned upon extended degree studies because I really expected the
Lord to return very soon. However, when I heard that extra-mural lectures would
be given at the University College of the Western Cape (UCWC), I jumped at the opportunity
to start degree studies, conveniently pushing aside my earlier disdainful reservations
to study at a ‘Bush’ college. Soon I was cycling to the school in the morning,
and from there to the afternoon and evening classes at UCWC. Often I utilised the time on the bicycle - e.g. holding a
book on the steering bar while I memorized the various forms of the German
strong or irregular verbs. (Not knowing that it would come in good stead one
day, I had included German Special as one of my degree courses.)
I was somewhat disappointed that the
tertiary institution could not offer Mathematics as a subject extra-murally
straight away. Only in my final year of the degree I included Mathematics in my
curriculum, doing it by correspondence with UNISA.
Being thoroughly materialistic at
this time, I only had eyes for the opportunity to get in line for promotion as
a teacher in later years, so that I would be able to earn more. But there was
also the academic field that beckoned. Posts at the new fledgling 'Coloured'
University were waiting to be filled by people from our racial grouping. As one
of the better and also the youngest of the extra-mural students, this was a
rather tempting option. From our pioneering first group of students - where we
also had certain lectures together with the day students - many would proceed
to become school inspectors and prominent academics.[6]
2. A young Teacher and Missionary
I was seriously
considering God’s call to full time service. Almost routinely I repeatedly put
it before the Lord at the prayer meetings every Sunday morning at six o’clock at
the Sendingkerk that I was completely
willing and prepared to proceed towards theological studies. But I wanted to be
absolutely sure that it was His calling.
A
significant Moravian Funeral
Next to Jakes, Reverend Ivan Wessels was my other hero.
He contracted leukaemia at the beginning of 1968. Ivan Wessels passed on after
a few weeks in Groote Schuur
Hospital, not very long after Professor Chris Barnard had just performed his
first heart transplants there.
Instead
of the weekend Sunday School Conference at the Pella Mission
Station that
had been scheduled, almost the whole Moravian
Church establishment gathered in the suburb Lansdowne on the Saturday for
the funeral of one of its most prodigious sons. Although very principled and
outspoken against any form of racism, it was characteristic that the highly
gifted Rev. Daniel Ivan Wessels was never jailed or banned because of his opposition
to apartheid - in contrast to so many other members of the Wessels clan. When
Bishop Schaberg challenged the congregation: ‘Who is going to fill the void
caused by our deceased brother?’ I
discerned God’s voice in my heart. Back home in Tiervlei after the funeral, it
was not difficult at all to say ‘Yes,
Lord, I’m prepared to be used by you to fill the gap.’
The
next day we went to the Pella Mission Station for our condensed Sunday
School conference. I was completely surprised when Reverend August Habelgaarn,
a member of the Church Board, approached me with the question whether I was interested
in a bursary for two years of theological studies at the Johanneum in Wupperthal (Germany).[7]
I had no hesitation to reply that I saw this as clear confirmation of the call
of the Lord the previous day. Another few months down the road, preparations
were well advanced towards my leaving for Germany at the beginning of 1969.
A
Missionary in Germany?
I regarded the stint in Europe from January 1969 in the first place as
an opportunity to study, but it was also combined with quite a dose of
missionary zeal. From the outset I regarded myself as a ‘short term
missionary’. (In those days such
terminology was however still unknown.) The notion of a missionary coming from
Africa to ‘Christian’ Europe was unheard of. But I was just as determined to
return to my home country thereafter to serve the Lord. The almost two years in Germany, during which
I learnt much about youth work in the first year, were very enriching. (It was
however not one-way traffic at all. I was pleasantly surprised that our own
Moravian Church youth work of the late 1960s was quite advanced. It compared
quite favourably with what Germany had to offer at that time.)
My first year was
devoted to studies in the biblical languages Greek, Hebrew and Latin.[8]
Fairly at
the beginning of my stint there, I once opposed Marxist theological students
even though I still could not yet express myself sufficiently in German, thus
needing a translator. A German lady from the audience exclaimed quite shocked
that their ‘Christian’ country was apparently now in need of missionaries from
Africa!
A Bachelor Boy?
I had just turned 23 when I left
South Africa. All around me my peers were getting married. The music of the
Beatles and Cliff Richard was influencing young people everywhere. I was not
happy however with the message Cliff Richard was spreading, that to be a
bachelor boy was the way to stay. (I was
nevertheless determined from the outset not to marry a German girl because that
would have prevented me from returning to South Africa due to of the laws of
the country at the time.) I had to learn the hard way (well, really?) that also
my emotions had to be brought under God’s rule! His ways were indeed higher,
also with regard to my future marriage partner. I had to learn that it was not fitting to prescribe to the Lord the race of my future
wife.
Enraged
in Europe
Before I left South
Africa in January 1969, Bishop Schaberg had warned me to stay clear of
politics, because spies from the apartheid government were also well
represented overseas. I initially heeded this warning without however really
making any conscious effort.
This changed when I received a
letter from my parents with shocking information. They had been served with a
notice of the expropriation by the Parow Municipality, expected to move
from our property in Tiervlei They would receive an amount for it with which
they could not get something substantial in return.
What really enraged me was that my
mother mentioned in her letter something about ‘the will of the Lord’. I
stopped just short of considering joining the armed struggle against the
apartheid government. This act was to me just another brutal example and
extension of their racist policies. I hereafter wrote quite a strong letter of
protest to the Parow Municipality, with copies to some people in
Tiervlei. Hereafter, I became almost reckless in my opposition to the South
African government. I was now very critical of the regime, also in public
utterances.
My protest letter after the
expropriation of our house in Tiervlei did not have much of an effect. My
parents moved to the vacant house of Oupa
and Ouma Cloete on the Elim Mission Station.
Daddy became a migrant labourer, going to Elim one weekend per month.
Health-wise it all became too much
for him. It affected his heart. At the age of 58, he was forced to go on early
retirement.
My
missionary Zeal decreased
When my parents moved
to Elim - thus without visible reminders and news from me - the support from
the Tiervlei prayer warriors diminished. Parallel to it, much of my initial
missionary zeal all but vanished. My opposition to the government of my home
country got a personal touch when I fell in love with Rosemarie Göbel in May 1970.
When I returned to South Africa in October of that year, I knew for certain
that this was the girl whom I wanted to marry. The prohibition of racially
mixed marriages was however a huge stumbling block.
I was terribly in love, soon telling
our wonderful love story to all and sundry. At one of the occasions when I
blurted it out, my cousin John Ulster, who was the minister of the Elim Mission Station at the time,
pointed the obvious out to me, namely that I had to choose between South Africa
or Rosemarie. (His sister had been exiled to all intents and purposes after her
marriage to a sailor from Britain who had been based in Simon’s Town.) I wanted
both South Africa and Rosemarie. This must have looked really stupid and naive
at that time because a marriage to a (White) German was just not a runner. But
I was too much in love to accept that. I was determined to marry Rosemarie,
resolving to fight to get her into South Africa.
Fighting
Apartheid among young People
After my return to Cape Town, I was swept along by the politics of the
day. Ever since reading books from Martin Luther King and Albert Luthuli during
my stay in Germany- literature that were either unavailable or declared banned
in South Africa - my interest was more than merely aroused. I was ablaze in
opposition to apartheid, seeing this as my Christian duty. One of the first
things after my return was to join the Christian Institute (CI). Here I
linked up with Paul Joemat, my old rebel soul mate in the Moravian Church. He also had the vision that Christians should be
actively engaged in opposing the unchristian apartheid ideology.
We were quite disappointed when we
discovered that the young ‘White’ members of the CI were not prepared to fall
foul of the immoral apartheid laws. I suggested that we could board a train
together and then walk through the different racially designated train coaches.
The idea was that all of us might then have been arrested for the infringement.
Paul and I were quite prepared to embarrass the government in that way.
However, the ‘White’ members opined that it was not CI policy to do illegal
things. Paul and I decided to stop going there. This was perhaps not the wisest
thing to do because the two of us were the only young CI members sporting a
darker shade of pale in terms of skin pigmentation.[9]
Addressing
the Communist Iron Curtain
Just before I left
South Africa in January 1969, I bought a booklet at the Christian bookshop of
Nic de Goede, the leader of the Wayside Mission in Parow. The booklet ‘Tortured for Christ’ by Richard
Wurmbrand, in which the author describes how he had been maltreated in
Communist Romania, made a deep impression on me. In Germany I soon had the
opportunity to listen to the testimony of the Romanian pastor himself and hear
about the experiences of Christians in the Communist countries.
Hereafter
I received the periodical of the organization founded by Richard Wurmbrand
every month. I also started practising fasting on Friday mornings and praying
for imprisoned Christians behind the ‘iron curtain‘. Initially this was actually
more or less faceless untargeted praying, but it would change in later years
when we received photographs of the persecuted Christians. Nevertheless, although
I learned through experience the power of prayer, I never really proceeded to
become a prayer intercessor in the best sense of the word.
Efforts to ‘assist God’
A major problem had arisen in Germany after Rosemarie and I had fallen
in love with each other. She confided with her mother who was not happy with
the match. She allowed Rosemarie however
to correspond with me without the knowledge of Mr Gȍbel, her husband. She was
probably not the only one who thought that our friendship would peter out after
some time.
On this side of the ocean there was
the ominous ‘Mixed Marriages Act’, the prohibition of any marital bond between
a ‘White’ and someone from another race. After
reading in a local newspaper about someone who had been racially reclassified,
this looked to be my big chance. I could not accept the ‘realistic’ options of
either Rosemarie or South Africa.
My parents magnanimously declared
their willingness to release me to return to Germany, rather than allowing me
to bring Rosemarie into the humiliations of life that were associated with the
apartheid era, knowing that Rosemarie had not grown up here. I was too madly in
love to appreciate their sacrificial wisdom.
My effort to get Rosemarie reclassified as a ‘Coloured’ only created
more problems. Instead
of waiting on God’s intervention to enable a possible marriage, I decided to
‘assist Him’.
I
wrote to the Prime Minister to enquire about the procedure to have someone
reclassified. Objections from Wolfgang Schäfer, our Seminary lecturer - that I
would give recognition to the immoral racial laws of the country with such a
reclassification - could not deter me.
I desperately wanted
Rosemarie to come to South Africa, instead of me going to Germany again to
marry her. Knowing the objections of her family, Rosemarie was as yet far from
free to come to Africa. In one of her letters she actually requested me to pray
for her inner liberation in this regard. I had no problem with this, trusting
God to change that in due course. Didn’t she tell me when I invited her on our
first date to an evening with the Wycliffe
Bible Translators that she wanted to enter missions already since her childhood?
Thus I just pushed ahead with my ideas.
Secret friendship by Correspondence
Our secret friendship by correspondence –
without her father knowing about it - caused tremendous tension in the Gȍbel home in Mühlacker. This
ultimately hospitalised Rosemarie’s mother. When my darling could not handle
the secrecy anymore at this time, a tearful clash between her and her father
followed. This led to an exchange of a few letters between me and Mr Gȍbel.
I
‘negotiated’ a deal – turning his arm insolently - whereby I suggested that
Rosemarie and I would hereafter only write to each other at festive occasions.
He was too furious to reply, instructing her to write to me that I should stop
the correspondence, period. This she did not communicate to me, neither
immediately thereafter nor in her ‘Passover’ letter. I started writing my multi-paged
Pentecost epistle in the meantime, continuing with it during the subsequent
weeks.
Separation by Choice
I took a teaching post in the township-like suburb Elsies River,
studying part-time at the Moravian Seminary in
1971. Paul Joemat, my old stalwart rebel fighter of the Sunday School
conference days, started there with us.
A
confession on my part, namely that I kissed another girl in Cape Town, paved
the way for Rosemarie to start a friendship with a handsome young man in
Germany. This brought peace back into their home in Mühlacker. When I did not
hear from her at Pentecost – which I had elevated to the next occasion for an exchange
of love letters - I assumed that the South African government had intervened.
(There had been occasional fiddling with letters and I had of course also
attempted to get a reclassification process going so that we could get married).
I was so sure that the government was responsible via postal interference that
I did not even consider other possibilities. But I was also not prepared to accept this
without a fight.
The
refund of money that I had paid into the Pension Fund when I was operating as a
teacher before my resignation to go into full-time theological studies was very
timely. This enabled me to book flights for the June vacation of 1971.
Prayerfully I could put this as a ‘fleece’, a test. The Lord had to open
another door because the cheap Luxavia flight which I wanted to take was already
fully booked.
What
divine intervention would transpire in these weeks! It started with a phone
call from the airline Luxavia just one
day before the closing of schools for the term. There had been a cancellation! I
grabbed that seat eagerly of course.
But
there would also follow some surprise and disappointment. Only when I was in
Germany I had to face the hard fact that I had a rival. Rosemarie ultimately decided
to part friendship with both of us, leaving it over to God to bring us together
again if that was His will that we should marry one day.
- A Theological Student in District Six
For the second year of my theological
studies I moved to District Six. Now I was one of three Moravian Seminary full-time students, along with Gustine Joemath
and Fritz Faro. A big dose of cross‑cultural pollination was administered to us
as students during our time at the seminary in Ashley Street in District Six.
Not only the formal theological studies, but also the extra‑mural activities,
with which our German lecturers Henning Schlimm and Wolfgang Schäfer brought us
into contact, enriched our lives tremendously. The Seminary was very much
involved with the activities of the Christian
Institute. Both Bishop’s Court, the residential area where the richest of
the Cape Town affluent live and Black townships,were places that I had not
visited before.
An article in Pro Veritate,
the periodical of the Christian Institute, depicted how South Africa is
a micro-cosmos – a sample of the world at large. This presented me with a challenge. If it were
true that all the problems of the world are present in a compact way in our
country, why couldn’t the Republic of South Africa give an example to the world
to the solution of these very problems? Without any ado Henning Schlimm allowed
me to examine ‘Poverty in the 'Old Testament' for a mini thesis in that
subject.
Low-key Activism
I had made no secret of my sentiments regarding
justice in South Africa, posturing a self-written T-shirt with “Reg en
Geregtigheid” (A call for justice and righteousness) at the front and
“Civil Rights” on the back. One had to reckon with it that such provocations
would be registered in police circles to one’s disadvantage.
More Divine Intervention
Returning to the Seminary in
Ashley Street from a political demonstration in June 1972 that had been dispersed
by police using teargas, there was a special letter from Germany. I received one
directly from my ‘Schatz’(darling)!
I was startled at what I could read there. Through the
'Old Testament'[10]
Watchword on her birthday ‘love the stranger in your gates’, Rosemarie’s
mother had been challenged to give us permission to resume our correspondence.
As Rosemarie’s 21st birthday was approaching, the Lord spoke to Mama Göbel
through another word from Scripture: ‘Love
your neighbour as yourself.’ She
knew that it meant for her that she had to accept me as a possible future
son-in-law. She reacted positively, giving Rosemarie permission to write to me
again! This was very courageous of Mrs Göbel because she knew that this was
definitely not the wish of her husband. With
the aid of Henning Schlimm, our seminary director and my confident, a teaching
post for Rosemarie was secured at the (German) Kindergarten of the St Martini Lutheran Church in the
Capetonian Long Street. Pastor Osterwald displayed quite a lot of courage in
appointing her, albeit that he had to do it secretly, making sure that there
would be no copy of a covering letter.
Playing with Fire
Rosemarie tried to send me a tape cassette with a ‘Coloured’ South
African from Gleemoor, a part of Athlone, a suburb of Cape Town. On this
cassette she included Pastor Osterwald’s advice: ‘I want to tell you that
your decision to start on this daring venture will lead you into many a
conscientious conflict...’
Early one October morning of 1972,
while I was praying for the country, I felt constrained to write a letter to
the Prime Minister. In this letter, I addressed him with ‘Liewe’ (dear),
with affection implied. (‘Geagte’ – Honourable - would have been more
appropriate.) That was definitely something extraordinary. My natural feelings
towards Mr Vorster were not that charitable. In my letter I challenged Mr
Vorster to lead the nation in the ways of God. Basically, it was however a
letter of criticism that could have catapulted me into hot water. I was
fortunate that I only received a formal reprimand from Mr Vorster. His letter
was actually a standard circular in which only the name of the recipient was
inserted with an electric typewriter.
In a sense Prime Minister Vorster
was not completely off target when he accused me of ‘making politics under the
guise of religion’. (This was apparently his standard reply to religious
objection to
the racial policies of the country.) I had challenged
him in this letter to be used by God like President Lincoln to get our country
out of the catastrophic direction of the apartheid politics, heading for
disaster. Yet, prayer had inspired my letter.
I was far from
careful when I stated openly in a newsletter to friends in Germany that
Rosemarie would come and work in Cape Town in February the following year. That
was courting with trouble.
A
direct Call from Germany
I was
still counting the days to the beginning of March 1973 when Rosemarie was
due to arrive. Great was the disappointment when the first of March came and
went without any news of her visa. We had thought that this would be a mere
formality. I was completely stunned when my ‘Schatz’ phoned me on the direct line from Germany which had just
come into operation. She wanted to share the content of a letter that she had
received from the South African Consulate in Munich:
‘I regret to have to inform you
that your application for permanent residence in the Republic of South Africa
has been turned down...’ No reason was given although it was fairly obvious
to each and everyone who knew the country’s race policies.
Anticipating the visa, Rosemarie had
resigned from her work at the children’s hospital in Tübingen. But she
fortunately soon procured a post thereafter at a school for mentally retarded
children where Elke Maier, her close friend, was teaching.
Spiritually
Miles apart
Looking
back, we saw that the Lord was very gracious to us. Our brittle love would have
been put under immense pressure by the compulsory sphere of secrecy as a result
of the apartheid laws. But also theologically and spiritually we were miles
apart at that moment. I had become rather liberal, theologically influenced by the
emerging Black Theology and the
teaching at the seminary. The lectures were definitely not evangelical. Black Theology had an air of negativity
and resentment towards Whites around it.
The spiritual environment in which
Rosemarie was operating in Tübingen at the time was very conservative, not in
the best traditions of that word. The predominantly student congregation that
she had joined had close contacts with Bob
Jones University in in the USA where the full individual freedom in Christ
was not always practised. It is doubtful whether our sensitive relationship
would have survived the double tension if Rosemarie had been able to come to
South Africa in March 1973.
Contrasting Influences
Under the
influence of Black Theology, I had
been gradually moving away from my walk with the Lord. But God was working in
my life as well. Our student colleague Fritz Faro was greatly influenced by the
Jesus People, a group of young men and women who came out of the hippy
movement. A spiritual revival had broken out among them. We appreciated that
these young people were radical like us, although we had problems with their
a-political stance. We seminarians could definitely not accept any situation where
despicable apartheid practices were uncritically taken on board.
We also sharpened our axes for White
liberals who professed to be against apartheid but who were not prepared to
suffer for their convictions. The renowned St George’s Cathedral and the
Jesus People failed our test when we noticed how the congregants were still
sitting separately along racial lines. Spiritually however, the radicalism of
the Jesus People did rub off. It reminded me of my days with the
SCA young people. I had become somewhat estranged from the latter group,
possibly because of the liberal phase through which I was going.
Gustine Joemath
and I, the other two full-time students, tried to accommodate what we regarded
as an overdrawn evangelistic zeal of Fritz Faro and the Jesus People. At the same time we deemed it necessary to
challenge the apparent Jesus People acceptance of the racist South
African way of life. Thus we invited a student from Rhodesia - as Zimbabwe was
called in those days - to join us in evangelistic outreach on Muizenberg beach.
The idea was just to go and sing choruses, using our instruments. Gustine and
Fritz were good guitar payers and I had a trumpet.) As this beach was denoted
‘for Whites only’, the three of us were liable to be arrested. After having
been probably ‘advised‘ by South African Whites, our Rhodesian friend copped
out with a flimsy excuse.
All Races welcome!
When we
walked past a city church
one Sunday afternoon we decided to challenge this congregation that also
displayed prominently that they welcomed all races. Reverend Douglas Bax and
his St Andrew‘s Presbyterian Church passed our test with flying colours.
Thereafter Douglas became a close friend of our seminary.
The two years of
full-time study at the seminary however also included a good balance with
evangelistic activity. Now and then Jakes would come and pick me up on a Friday
evening to join evangelistic outreach like that of Ds. Pietie Victor’s Straatwerk.
Visa Refusal
We
regarded it important that Rosemarie should at least get acquainted with South
Africa and my family. Therefore she applied again, this time for a tourist
visa. Rosemarie was however refused a visa again, without any proper reason
given. Instead of coming to South Africa, she went to Israel with other
Christian friends. During this time in Israel, her love for the Jewish people
deepened.
After Rosemarie’s latest visa refusal,
I had to face the only option left for a possible marriage: It looked inevitable that I would
have to leave South Africa permanently. At this time a real struggle raged in my mind
and heart between the love for my country and my love for Rosemarie. So much I
wanted to make a contribution towards racial reconciliation. I thought,
perhaps a bit too arrogantly: “I can serve
God here in my native country better than anywhere else.” God still had to
be bring me down from that presumptuous pedestal. Rather ambivalently, I prayed
that He would let me fall in love with a ‘Coloured’ girl who would be ‘the
equal’ of Rosemarie. I still hoped that it would not be necessary to go
overseas to marry my bonny over the ocean. God
still had to humble me to accept his choice of a wife because I still somehow
did not want to leave South Africa permanently.
There
seemed to be only one way out: I had to choose between the love for Rosemarie and my love for the country. My cousin John Ulster was apparently right. Hesitantly
I opted to leave South Africa, with little realistic hope of a return.
Deep Soul Searching
The
South African Council of Churches initiated a new tradition in 1973. August was dubbed as the month of
compassion. Operating predominantly within the confines
of the ‘Coloured’ community, we knew that there was a definite need to address
the superiority complex towards Blacks. To this end we invited one of our CI friends,
the Congregational Church minister
Bongonjalo Claude Goba as the speaker for our youth service in District Six.[11]
This was possibly one of the first occasions where there was a Black South
African on the pulpit of Moravian Hill Chapel.
It was not surprising that an
honest congregant left the sanctuary demonstratively the very moment Claude
Goba walked to the pulpit. (We three full-time seminarians had done something
similar, leaving a church service quietly but agitatingly when a local pastor
persisted with segregated seating for visiting Moravian Germans the previous
year.)
Claude
Goba’s sermon brought about some deep soul searching, bringing my inner tussle
to a head. Was I not like Jonah, running away from the problems of our
revolution-ripe country? To cop out cowardly was the very last thing that I
wanted to do! The result was an intensification of my inner struggle between
the love for my country and my love for a foreign girl which could turn me into
an (in)voluntary exile.
My inner voice told me that I should apply for the extension of my
passport well ahead of its expiry on January the 16th the following year. I
considered that I could get peace at heart before my departure if I would apply
timely for an extension of my passport. But I couldn’t muster the courage (or
faith?) to apply! I just couldn’t stand the real possibility of a negative
response. I knew this could have been the test to discern God’s will for me.
But I feared that the semi-political involvement of the recent months could
have jeopardized such an extension.
Our Church Board co-operated optimally.
(There might have been some heated debating internally until they got there.) The
Board came up with the suggestion that I could go and work with the Moravian
Church in Germany at the end of the year. Offically this was called
pastoral exchange. For the one or other of the Board members it might have
boiled down to good riddance of a rebellious young minister.
Other
Things that kept us busy
But there were also other things that kept us busy at
the seminary, e.g. preparations for a youth rally with the theme Youth Power in the Old Drill Hall.[12] The theological
seminary played a major role in the organizing of that event. Dr Beyers Naudé, the leader of the CI, was our high-profiled
speaker who was invited to address the youth rally. This was typical of
the position of our institution in opposition to the regime. As Dr Naudé was
lodging with the Schlimm family, he heard about my pending departure for
Germany to take up a position as assistant minister and about the link to my
darling Rosemarie,
the real reason of my departure. (Henning and Anne Schlimm had been my confidants
during the three years of my studies at the seminary.)
Apart
from playing the trumpet in our small band, I was not as deeply involved in the
run-up to the event because of my pending departure for Germany. There were all sorts
of other things to see to like greeting many people like friends and relatives prior to my departure. Following
in the footsteps of a cousin who married an Englishman around 1950, many from the
ranks of family and friends expected this to be my final farewell to South
Africa. I was about to become an exile!
4. Back in Germany!
Once in Europe, I applied as soon
as possible for the extension of my passport. My anxiety was thankfully
dispelled when I received my passport, extended for a further three years.
However, I still yearned to return to Africa, preferably to Southern Africa!
Rosemarie and I became engaged for marriage in March 1974, albeit with
no family from either side present. A week later I was due to leave for West
Berlin, where the main part of my vikariat
(assistant ministership), was due to take place.
Practical
Ministry of Reconciliation
In my correspondence
with the church back home and with the South African government I still tried
to fight for my return to the country.
At a German Moravian pastors’
conference in May 1974 I shared the room with Eckard Buchholz, a missionary
from the Transkei. He was not sceptical at all - like so many other people -
about the fact that the South African government intended to give proper
independence to the homeland. In fact, Eckard challenged me to come and work
there after the commencement of the independence of the ‘homeland’, due to
follow in 1976. He was confident that Transkei would not take over the racist
mixed marriages prohibition. I gladly accepted the challenge.
I
grappled seriously with the idea of ministering in the Transkei. To this end I started learning Xhosa with the aid of
audiocassettes that Eckhard had sent. However, I did not
discuss my intentions in this regard with Rosemarie fully. Taking for granted that she wanted to be a missionary one
day, I expected that she would join me to go and serve in the Transkei.
The End of our
Engagement?
During her visit to West Berlin in mid-1974, where I
was serving, I casually communicated my intention to return to Southern Africa.
I was completely taken by surprise to
hear now that she was not ready at all to go to ‘Africa’ with me. The
termination of our engagement was on the cards, because I was quite determined
to return to the African continent as soon as possible. I didn’t feel like
‘hanging around’ in Europe for any length of time. It is quite strange that we
never discussed this matter thoroughly before we got engaged!
Neither
of us was prepared for this turn of events. What could we do now? On the issue
of our future abode, we seemed to be miles apart! In our utter despair, we cried
to God for help! We loved each other so dearly. We didn’t want to part, but about
such an important matter we had to agree of course. It had to be sorted out
immediately. We loved each other far too much. In complete desperation we
prayed together, asking God to guide us through His Word.
Divine
intervention seemed to be the only possibility to save our union. Both of us
knew that it would not be the proper way to handle Scripture, but we decided to
seek ‘God’s mind’ by opening the Bible at random, but prayerfully. When the
Word of God fell open at the verse where Ruth said to Naomi, ‘I shall go
where you go’, we were filled with awe and thankfulness. We were extremely
elated as we sensed that this was God’s special word for us. We could go into
the unknown future together, and that’s what both of us really wanted!
It could
have been a problem if we had discussed the issue further, because both of us
interpreted the Bible verse from the own perspective. I trusted that Rosemarie
would join me, going to Southern Africa. She thought that I would now stay in
Europe. Thankfully, we didn’t pursue the matter further. For the moment,
parting was not necessary. We were overjoyed at this confirmation that we would
be serving the Lord together, wherever He would lead us!
A Visa at last!
We still deemed it important enough - if possible at
all – for Rosemarie to get to know my home country and my relatives. Because I
was now in Germany, a major obstacle to a tourist visa should have been
eliminated. At least, that was how we reasoned.
We wrote
to the Moravian Church Board in South
Africa, asking whether Rosemarie could come over to do voluntary work for a
period of two months at the Elim Home,
an institution for spastic children on the Elim
Mission station. (My parents had relocated to Elim after they were more or
less forced to leave our home in Tiervlei by municipal decree, to go and live
in the small Moravian settlement from where they had hailed originally. With
increased hope Rosemarie applied for a visa for the third time. Along with the
application she sent an explanatory letter, mentioning the fact that she wanted
to get to know my parents better.
We were quite
encouraged when we heard from my parents that the Special Branch (of the
police) had left a note in Elim: Rosemarie and I could come to South Africa
together, on condition that we would not contact the press.
The Moravian Church Board in South Africa co-operated
optimally once again. Rosemarie was
invited to come and work as a volunteer at the Elim Home for chi*ldren with severe
disabilities for a period of two months. We were encouraged by the message of the
Special Branch. At that point in time we had no intention whatsoever of going
to South Africa as a couple. Therefore it really took us by surprise when
instead of the requested two months, Rosemarie received a visa for only two
weeks. A ticket for only two weeks would have been exorbitant and defeating the
very purpose, namely that Rosemarie could get to know my parents and my home
country at least a little bit.
I was in no mood to accept the
slap in the face passively. The Special Branch had given
us an idea, the possibility of spending our honeymoon in South Africa! This
notion was something that would give us severe hassles.
The political activism which had taken hold of
me ever since my return from Europe in 1970 and which had been substantially
fed during my seminary days, was fuelled anew. We requested the visa to be
extended to four weeks. We also brought forward our original wedding date, to
be in South Africa for the Easter holidays and spend our honeymoon there.
A Honeymoon in
Separation?
An adventurous but nerve-recking correspondence plus a visit
to the South African consulate in Munich followed. The result was that
Rosemarie actually received a visa for four weeks, albeit under the condition
that she would “not travel accompanied by your future husband.” The lady at the consulate warned us not to
circumvent the condition.
Initially I didn’t see any problem with the condition. I was so elated
that Rosemarie
received a visa at last to visit my home country! But in the car on our way
back from Munich, Rosemarie had a poser for me. She didn’t want to go to my “heimat”
(fatherland) alone any more. All the arrangements for our wedding had more or
less been finalised already by this time. Rosemarie’s
apt vexing question was “What sort of honeymoon is this?” I had no reply
ready. With a fearful heart I agreed that we would travel separately, in spite
of the warning. The prospect that I would now still see my family and friends
was so enticing. Originally I did not expect that as a possibility so soon! In
fact, I had already accepted that I might never seem them again.
A Honeymoon with a Difference
Rosemarie and I got
married in March 1975. Her first
visit to South Africa was surely a unique honeymoon journey.[13]
We took considerable risk, circumventing the condition of the visa by
travelling into the country with different airlines. I felt terrible that I had
to mislead everybody in South Africa, giving the impression that Rosemarie
would be coming alone. I did not dare to inform anybody that I intended coming
as well, fearing that our plan would be wrecked on my arrival. I was not
supposed to enter the country at that time. By government decree it should have
been a ‘honeymoon in separation’.
It was not easy at all for Rosemarie
- travelling two days after me and not knowing whether the police had not
perhaps arrested me in the meantime.
Initially we intended to stick to the strange condition of the visa, even making preparations to
sleep in separate homes in Elim, the mission station where my parents were
living, as well as in the Mother City. We changed our tickets so that we could travel back in
the same Lufthansa machine, flying
straight to Frankfurt. Having fulfilled the
condition of the visa, not to enter the country together, we returned with
thankful hearts that nothing seriously happened that could have marred the
wonderful honeymoon.
5. An Anti-Apartheid Activist
I was ordained in
September 1975. After the ordination, Rosemarie and I returned to the divided
city of Berlin. There we lost our unplanned ‘honeymoon baby’ less than two
months after our arrival, prematurely dead-born. Through my studies my
enthusiasm for evangelism suffered a lot, although I was still fasting and
praying on Fridays on behalf of the Communist world.
Low-key
Protest against Church Tradition
My personal protest against senseless
church tradition was quite low-key. In the West Berlin Moravian congregation
– that was notorious for its ultra conservatism - where I had ministered from
1974 as an assistant minister and where we returned to in September 1975 after the
ordination, I was nevertheless fairly successful in breaking down barriers of tradition and
prejudice such as against foreigners.
In
Berlin itself I straddled the Christian world. Because of my socialist stance,
some really leftist pastors invited me as a speaker at vaarious occasions. On
the other hand, I worked alongside the organisers of an evangelical campaign
with Ulrich Parzany, who was up and coming as an evangelist. In those days it
was rather unusual to be evangelical and at the same time radical in one’s
opposition to apartheid. Not everybody had understanding that this was
perfectly possible. Some people might have been shocked if they knew that I
also attended the Pentecostal services with Volker Spitzer at Nollendorfplatz
occasionally.
An Africa-styled Wedding in Berlin
The congregation had no
qualms however when Eckhard Buchholz, our Transkei missionary, wanted me to
marry him and Cathy Ncongo, a Zulu language teacher. The authorities in
Pretoria would surely have fainted if they had attended the Africa-styled
wedding in Berlin in October 1976. Not only was it very special to see the
beautiful black bride narrate the African customs with great composure, but
also to hear a racially mixed group of South Africans - including a few political
exiles - singing Nkosi sikelel i’Afrika. In those days that anthem was
regarded as subversive inside the beloved country.
The West Berlin Moravian congregation soon discovered that
Africa also had a lot to give. With Cathy’s Roman Catholic background,
it was fitting that Alan Boyles, a ‘Coloured’ Natalian who studied for the
priesthood when he met his German-background wife Helga, translated my sermon
into English for the sake of the bride.
The church people had no inkling how meaningful it was for the South
African contingent to sing ‘Nkosi Sikelel I’Afrika together as a
racially mixed choir. But they did enjoy the ‘bring and share’ church
celebration, a community occasion which was unknown over there at that time.
This was a completely new experience for the German congregation, but
apparently thoroughly enjoyable for everybody.
Birth of Danny
A really emotional experience
followed soon after our move to Berlin. At the very first time Rosemarie went
to the gynaecologist there, he discovered problems, diagnosing placental
insufficiency. She was sent to a hospital, but the baby couldn’t be saved.
Even though we had not ‘planned’ to get a baby in the first year of our
marriage, we had really looked forward to the birth of our first child. Our
little David came stillborn into the world.
Even more traumatic for Rosemarie was
that she was alone in her grief. I had to preach on the Sunday when the
hospital gynaecologist decided to induce the birth of the lifeless foetus. The
staff of the institution, the ‘Neuköllner
Krankenhaus’, was hardly interested in her as a person once it was known
that the baby had died. Only the Turkish lady cleaner showed compassion to a
young mother who had lost her first baby!
Great was
the joy a little while later when we had my parents with us in Berlin. They had
originally planned to visit us after the birth of our child. Soon thereafter,
Rosemarie was pregnant once again. Tension arose when a complication set in.
She was therefore closely monitored in the highly rated Steglitz Hospital. All
the more we were happy when Rosemarie gave birth to Danny on 4 February, 1977
via a caeserian operation.
A
Movement for peaceful Change?
Clarion calls were
going up in 1976 for action against South Africa in the wake of the June 16 Soweto
killings. I was asked to address a
protest meeting in the Kaiser Wilhelm
Memorial Church of West Berlin. The general feeling was that the beloved
country would soon be going up in flames. I believed that Christians should do
all they can to stop the rot.
My
‘Soweto’ speech in the ‘Kaiser Wilhelm
Gedächtnis’ Church in Central Berlin catapulted me into the role of
mediator in a dispute between foreign African students and the local
authorities. After listening to my effort of mediation, Heinz Krieg, who was
connected to the Moral Re-armament
(MRA) movement,[14] came
to see me. A friendship ensued to Heinz and his wife Gisela.
When we
were about to leave for Holland in September 1977, the Kriegs gave me a
challenging book as a parting gift with the title: South Africa, what kind
of change? When I read about personal friends from the Cape mentioned in
the book, I was challenged once again to become even more of an activist for
racial reconciliation in my home country. This signalled the start of a stint
with the Moral Re-armament movement
and more activism than ever before.
I
now set out to start a front for peaceful change, attempting to use non-violent
means to get the racist structures in South Africa changed. I wrote many letters
to this end. But support was not forthcoming. Almost all the friends whom I
approached had given up on the possibility of a non-violent end to the racial
conflict in South Africa. Only
Rachel Balie, a compatriot from the Southern Cape and who was
studying in West Berlin, supported me as I attempted
to start this front for a peaceful change from the racist set-up in my home
country.
The initial reaction of the West
German government to the peaceful protest of the South African learners was to
all and sundry the proof that the days for boycotts and the likes were over. It
appeared on the cards that Willy Brandt’s government would now also support the
armed opposition. At this point in time I saw boycotting South
Africa as one of the few remaining options short of the violent struggle that I
opposed. Yet, from within I was not completely happy. How could I support
boycotts where others back home would have to bear the brunt? It would get a
personal touch when my brother Windsor subsequently lost his laboratory job in
the fruit industry as a result of the boycott of South African goods in Europe.
Of course, there were also Christians who were opposed to boycotts for
different reasons.
Opposition
in full Force
We encountered opposition in full force in
our congregation when we wanted to dedicate our infant son Danny instead of
having him christened during the Passover (Easter) week-end. We had a
battle with the local church council. The Church Order allowed for this mode,
so that the child could be christened at a later age when he/she could
understand what was done. The stance of the church council was that we as the
pastoral couple were now upsetting the apple cart, because child dedication
turned out to be only a theoretical possibility.
Our
request caused quite a furore. A church council member put it quite bluntly:
‘How can the son of the minister walk around as a heathen?’ Normally I would
have fought the issue to the hilt, but at that point in time we didn’t want to
blow up the matter out of proportion.
When
another couple wanted to have their infant christened during the
same Passover (Easter) weekend, we decided to settle for a compromise. We did
not want to play the two modes off against each other. (Two and a half
years after the birth of Danny we did rock the boat in the Moravian Church on
the issue of infant christening.) We had Waltraud, Rosemarie’s sister, Elke
Maier, our bridemaid and Rachel Balie, as the godparents of Danny.
Off
to Holland!
My denomination
needed someone to pastor the congregation in the city of Utrecht who could
learn Dutch quickly. As the related language of Afrikaans is my native
language, the Church Board approached Rosemarie and me. (Prior to this I had
indicated that Rosemarie and I were open to work among the Surinamese people in
Holland.) With little hesitation we accepted the call.
During my last
Resurrection morning sermon in Berlin in 1977, I challenged the very
conservative congregation on the use of female preachers, by pointing out that
Mary Magdalene was the first ‘evangelist’, the carrier of the message of the
risen Lord according to the Gospel of John. I could in this way prepare the way
for my successor, Karin Beckmann - to become the first female pastor of
the congregation.
It was furthermore agreed with the
Church Board that we would initially live on the Broederplein of Zeist,
at the historical Moravian settlement where the Count Zinzendorf had held a
revolutionary synod centuries ago.
6. Continued Activism
Soon after our arrival in Zeist
(Holland), Rachel Balie, who had returned to South Africa after her studies in
Berlin, wrote that Chris Wessels, a long-time minister friend whose home
Rosemarie and I had visited on our honeymoon journey, had been imprisoned. His main ‘offence’ was that he helped to care
for and assisted with advocacy on behalf of the families of political
prisoners. Furthermore, Chris was never formally accused or brought before a
court of law.
According to Rachel, the
wife of Chris did not even know where the police was detaining him.
My
activist Spirit aroused
My
activist spirit was easily aroused, egged on by Rosemarie when she pointed to
the death of Steve Biko. I promptly phoned our church authorities in Germany,
urging them to intervene on behalf of Chris Wessels.
Shortly before this, Steve Biko died
while in police custody. We feared that the same thing could happen to Chris
Wessels. Worse followed when the Minister of Police publicly exclaimed that the
death of Biko in custody left him cold. This was the stuff that made headlines
- but it was not reassuring for us, aware that the same thing could happen to our
friend in some forlorn place.
My understanding of Scripture was that
the least I could do was to try and get Chris released. The news of the death
of Steve Biko helped our cause. I moved forcefully to get the Moravian Church of Europe in action on
behalf of our brother in detention. Initially it involved quite a battle to get
the church authorities in Bad Boll (Germany) on board, but they finally also nudged
their colleagues in other countries to write to their respective South African
Embassies or Consulates. Later we heard that this action possibly saved Chris
Wessels’s life.
We were still settling down in Zeist
when all of us were shocked by more bad news from South Africa. Dr Beyers
Naude, who had been their guest, not long before this, was banned along with
the Christian Institute and a few
organisations. Just
over a year later I was involved with advocacy on behalf of Dr Beyers Naudé,
urging Dutch Reformed church leaders
to get his ban lifted.
Unhealthy Activism A flurry of letters to different
government departments that I wrote in a rage of activism was basically quite
naive. However, the one or other of these letters turned out to be quite
strategic. Instead of a humble servant of reconciliation, I had become an
activist.
I started collating all the
documents and correspondence pertaining to our struggle with the authorities
in South Africa. Driven by an unhealthy activism, I got up at two o’clock in
the morning after perhaps three hours of sleep. I would then return to bed at
five a.m. for another round of sleep. By 8 o’clock I was usually again behind
my desk. I believed firmly that I did not need more than six hours of sleep per
day anyway.
The unsound
Premise of my Call to Utrecht
The premise of my call to the Moravian congregation of
Utrecht was not sound. A Surinamese brother representing the Utrecht
congregation, had heard me attacking the South African Moravian Church for its double standards at a synod of the Moravian
European Continental Church Synod in May 1975. Rev. Hansie Kroneberg, a member
of the Broederkerk[15]
Church Board of South Africa had addressed the public synod meeting that took
place in Bad Boll. I embarrassed Rev.
Kroneberg uncharitably, by exposing the lack of support of the South African Church Board given
tohri the banned Reverend Wessels in the mission station Genadendal (On our
honeymoon we had visited the old pensioner).
The
Surinamese brother thus thought that they would get a young ‘political’ fire-brand
pastor. He didn’t bargain for one who also had a strong evangelical leaning,
one who was on top of it deeply influenced by a moral radicalism. Later this would
cause quite a lot of tension in the Utrecht Broederraad (Church Council).
After merely three months in
office I was involved in a head-on collision with my Utrecht church council,
because I didn’t mince words in my sermons. I challenged the congregants on
moral issues, as well as inviting them towards complete submission to the
claims of Christ. Once I used evangelical terminology of Count Zinzendorf, the
founder of the Renewed Moravian Church
- winning souls for the Lamb. This was
maliciously interpreted as something tantamount to sheep stealing. After I had
used testimonies of Moral Re-armament folk from South Africa in a church
service on Christmas Day, it was equated with the practices of Jehovah’s
Witnesses.[16]
But I was determined, not willing to budge. In fact, I revelled in fighting for
biblical truth. I was rather unwise to go to such extremes almost at the outset
of my tenure in the congregation.
Initially Rosemarie also attended the
meetings of the ‘Broederraad’, the church council that took place in our
home. But soon it became too much for Rosemarie. Unable to take the unfair
attacks on me anymore, she decided to rather stay at home when the meetings
were relocated to the church building of the Vrije Evangelische Gemeente in Ivoordreef, Utrecht.
Another Visit to
South Africa Already at the beginning of
1977 we had started planning another visit to South Africa in February the
following year. The call to serve a congregation in Holland necessitated
re-planning. In due course our visit was scheduled for the end of September
1978. Soon after commencing our ministry in Holland, we arranged with the church
board that we could add the two weeks of holiday still due to us to that of the
next year. All in all we would be away for six weeks.
A terrible
Fright
We had started making preparations for the second
visit to South Africa when we got the fright of our lives. Rosemarie went to Dr
Wittkampf, our family doctor in Zeist, because she had noticed a lump at her
throat. He immediately phoned the hospital - he suspected a tumor! We were
already over-sensitive after a series of terminal cancer cases had been occurring
in our circle of friends. In this atmosphere it was all gloom. Tears were
flowing freely.
I hurt
Rosemarie immensely when I was so insensitive to clearly verbalise her possible
passing on as an opportunity to return to South Africa. What a strain this
brought to our marriage, the first really serious disagreement in our blissful union
because I dared to express this so crudely. After the traumatic experiences in
the run-up and aftermath of our honeymoon trip, Rosemarie had come to resist the
idea fiercely to return with me to my home country. She did not want to raise
children in such a racist environment. Her prayers thus went along the line of
“Lord, I’m prepared to serve you anywhere in the world, but not in South
Africa!”
The Lord
somehow spoke to Rosemarie through the traumatic experience with the tumor. She vowed that she would be prepared to join me to my
native country if the Lord would spare her life. But she did not share
this with me.
Reprieve from an unexpected Source
Though we had few
problems during our honeymoon, some experiences had frightened her terribly.
She did not want to live in South Africa permanently.
A
positive element of the detection of the tumor in Rosemarie’s throat was that
we were given some reprieve from the malice and accusations in our Utrecht
church council, which was
inappropriately called Broederraad.[17] Suddenly it seemed as if everybody rallied
around us. In those days being diagnosed with any form of cancer was like getting
a death sentence.
Our
Grief turned to Joy!
At the height of the crisis we were encouraged by
a word from Scripture. In our utter despair we
turned to the Lord in prayer. At this stage John 16:20 comforted us extremely:
“Your grief will turn to joy!” A few weeks later the tumor was removed
in an operation - the subsequent report showed that the tumor was benign!
Indeed, our grief turned to extreme joy!
How we rejoiced at the new lease of
life together as a couple! Our next newsletter - in which we testified of the
blessings of Rosemarie’s recovery - caused ripples in many a quarter. I had
written the newsletter in parts. The first part of the newsletter was penned
before it had been discovered that the tumor was benign and the last part
reflected the joy we experienced.
Copies of the newsletter landed at
the African National Congress (ANC)
headquarters in Lusaka and at the offices of the Anti-Apartheid Movement in London. (Our personal newsletter was
possibly relayed to the various bodies via people from the Moral Rearmament ranks.) I was neither interested in scoring
political points nor was I prepared to be pulled on to a political bandwagon.
Instead, I challenged the folk on some issues, writing the Anti-Apartheid folk
a critical letter. Referring to the root of the word protest in Latin pro-testare
(to testify for something), I
noted that I preferred to fight for
something good - rather than protest
against something bad.
Reg September, one of the African National Congress (ANC) leaders
wrote from the head office in Lusaka. (He would visit us in Zeist the following
year.) Reg had detected that I used the word Azania in my correspondence. I was not aware that this was Pan African Congress parlance, the
vocabulary of the bitter rivals of the ANC. All of that were trivialities to
me. Much more important was that we could resume our preparations to visit
South Africa again!
Hunger after Justice
As a radical activist I had started collating
the documents pertaining to oumy own struggle with the authorities in South
Africa, giving the manuscript the title Honger
na Geregtigheid [18] (Hunger for
Justice). In this manuscript I included and commented my
correspondence with the rulers of the day. As a matter of ethical
principle I wanted the work published in South Africa first, and in view of
good strategy, in Afrikaans.
Also our Moravian Church authorities at home came
under fire. I challenged the leaders to be more pro-active towards racial
reconciliation and equality between the privileged ‘Coloureds’ and the ‘Blacks’
in the denomination. Thus I challenged the leadership to use the same pastor
for the ‘Coloured’ congregation of Manenberg and the Xhosa one of Nyanga just
over the railway line. I relished this challenge, having started to learn Xhosa
already.
We received special permission to visit my home
country in September 1978. I regarded it as a victory for quiet diplomacy that
this visit with my wife and our one and a half year old son was possible. We
had written an accompanying letter to the government. I hoped that we could bring
the Cabinet to change petty apartheid laws gradually so that I could return
from exile sooner rather than later. (This philosophical approach of gradual
change in attacking petty apartheid would change substantially in due course.)
In September 1978 we left for South Africa on a
six-week visit. Experiences with the Moravian
Church leaders at the Cape and with the folk of Moral Rearmament would however not be amicable.
After
getting details of the time and venue of a meeting of the Church Board of the Moravian Church, I phoned the chairman,
requesting to attend it. When I challenged the lack of advocacy of the Church
Board at this occasion on behalf of our friend Chris Wessels (when he was
detained the previous year), I naturally got the members in opposition. When I furthermore
also suggested to come and serve in South Africa for three years and thus cause
another crack in the apartheid wall, I was put in my place in no uncertain
terms. My
activism was evidently too much for the Moravian
Church Board. My subsequent disappointment and anger thereafter
was misplaced, it was actually caused by my provocation.
Apartheid had the Beating of me
With our cash running
out towards the end of our stay, we decided to go and inquire at the Cape Town central
train station when we noticed an advertisement for cheap train fares. Our pride
was still very much of a deterrent to approach our family for money to fly back
to Johannesburg. Going into the White part of the train station to enquire –
and thus trespassing one of the prevalent petty apartheid laws - was much less
of an obstacle. However, our request to travel to
Johannesburg by train as a family in the same compartment had to be dealt with
at Cabinet level.
Perhaps
the Prime Minister and his colleagues wanted to appease us in this way and at
the same time preventing us from telling bad tales overseas about the country. But
it ignited the opposite effect in my heart. I did not feel honoured to be
treated as a VIP at all. I fumed in anger! When we heard that the required
permission had been given, I had already made up my mind never to return to
South Africa again!
Apartheid Bureaucracy added
Insult to Injury.
Petty apartheid bureaucracy added insult to injury. A Cabinet decision
was necessary to give clarity whether we could travel in the same compartment
as a family. I thus became an honorary White for the duration of that train
trip. Incidents of blatant racism on the long train trip from Cape Town to
Johannesburg rubbed more salt into the wounds.
Terribly angered by the Moravian Church Board meeting a few days
earlier and thereafter by the government handling of what I regarded as a
trivial matter, I was now determined never to put my foot on South African soil
again. I was not fair in my judgment, very much in the mould of Jonah who
sulked when God ‘changed his mind’ after the repentance of the inhabitants of
Nineveh.
Howard Grace, a British Moral
Rearmament (MRA)[19]
full-time worker, fetched us from Park Station in Johannesburg. He had to bear
the brunt of my anger. When I was still fuming, Howard suggested on the car
trip to Umdeni (the villa of the
movement, where we would lodge in the rondavel
for the next few days) to introduce me to the influential Professor Johan
Heyns. The moment of his kind gesture was the worst one the MRA brother could
have chosen. At that point in time I was definitely not prepared and interested
in meeting the chairman of the Broederbond,
the apartheid think tank!
Extreme Disappointment and
Anger On that November Saturday the MRA folk of Johannesburg were definitely
not encountering a happy Christian. There was little wonder that Howard and
others suspected that evening that I was after sensation when I phoned Dr
Beyers Naudé, the banned leader of the Christian Institute, to find out where he was
worshipping. There was ample reason for them to suspect that I was not sincere
in my wish to worship with Dr Naudé as one of my last actions in the country I
loved so passionately, but that I was about to leave - never to return to
again! Rosemarie was not discouraging me whatsoever. (I was unaware of the
secret vow she had made when she had the tumor that turned out to be benign.)
There
was only one thing that I still wanted to do before departing from South
Africa! I yearned to worship with Dr Beyers Naudé, who had been put under house arrest. Someone - or
perhaps even more than one person - must have been praying for me.
A Farewell
Gesture of Solidarity
I intended the visit to Dr Naudé’s congregation to be
my farewell gesture of solidarity with the politically oppressed of the
country.
Rosemarie
and I, along with a few believers linked to Moral
Rearmament, were privileged to visit the congregation that the Naudé couple
attended regularly. He entered there as the last person just before the bell
would toll as a signal for the minister and his church council to step out of
the vestry in procession. Dr Naudé then had to leave as the first congregant at
the end of the service by government decree because he was not allowed to speak
to more than one person at a time.
What a
welcome we received at the church! Dr Naudé had phoned his pastor, Dr van
Rooyen. The latter asked Ds Cloete uit
Duitsland after the formal welcome to introduce the rest of our group. (Dr
Naudé obviously merely remembered that I had left for Germany in 1973,
surmising that Rosemarie and I came from there. Or did he want to make sure
that we would not be refused entry at the church?) The courageous sermon of Dr
van Rooyen, critical of government policy, was so encouraging - almost
unforgettable!
Tannie Ilse,
the wife of Dr Naudé, came to us after the service, having organised that we
could follow Dr Naudé in his car to their home because she still had to teach
at the Sunday School.
Changed from within
The Father hereafter used the well-known Oom Bey Naudé
- who was loved by many who were not ‘White’ and hated by those who supported
apartheid - at their home in a special way.
A
miracle happened that Sunday. A supernatural change deep inside me started to
grow through the visit to the Naudé home. During the private interview I had
with him, a parallel process operated. It sruck me that he had no anger or
bitterness. And he had so much more reason to be angry or bitter! A
determination was ignited in me to work towards reconciliation between the
races of the beloved country.
In
the evening Rosemarie and I visited the Dutch-background family of Ds. Joop
Lensink whom we had met at the church. He ministered to Blacks in the mining
compounds. When I heard how the Lensink family was courageously harbouring
Black street children illegally, it inspired me towards a radical new
commitment. The secret meeting with Dr Beyers Naudé at their home - in
combination with the visit to the Lensink home - changed my attitude
completely. I now wanted to resume my fight to return with my family to South
Africa as soon as possible! I was changed from within!
The
next day I even phoned the office of the State President, with the intention of
trying to console the embattled President Vorster. (The ‘Muldergate’ scandal,
in which the maladministration of a Cabinet Minister, Dr Connie Mulder, was
implicating Mr. Vorster, had all but floored him).
Cured of my Bitterness and Anger
God used the banned Dr Beyers Naudé and the
congregation where he worshipped to bring me to my senses. Without them even knowing
it, God used them to cure me of my intense bitterness and anger towards the
country that I was loving - paradoxically - so dearly. A miracle happened that
day.
In
fact, after the red-letter Sunday I desperately wanted to make amends for my
racist bias. Hereafter, I set out to work quietly for the lifting of the ban of
the Dutch Reformed minister who had meant so much to me.[20]
I returned to
Holland with a new resolve to work towards racial reconciliation in my home
country after the six‑week visit to South Africa. I now regarded a ministry of reconciliation
even more as my duty to the country of my birth from abroad.
Greater
Determination to fight Apartheid
The Moral Rearmament practice of writing
down thoughts fuelled my activist spirit. Yet,
I wanted to win the government over rather than expose their evil practices
abroad. As a means to this end I targeted the Dutch Reformed theologians. I believed that they could play a pivotal
role in any change of government policy.
After reading that a church delegation from the influential (‘White’) Dutch Reformed Church - including the
Professors Johan Heyns and Willie Jonker - would attend some synod in Lunteren
(Holland), I took the initiative to go and meet them there. I saw this as a chance
to make amends for my headstrong refusal to meet Professor Heyns the previous
year when Howard Grace wanted to introduce me to him. However, the only
possibility that Dr Heyns and his colleagues could offer me was to meet the
delegation at Schiphol Airport, just
before their return to South Africa. This I did, hoping to send the draft of Honger na Geregtigheid to Dr Naudé with the delegation[21]
because of the well-known government tampering with post. (I had experienced this
myself.)
I urged
the clergymen to get the ban of Dr Beyers Naudé lifted, challenging them also
with regard to membership of a secret society. Prof Willie Jonker, whom I still
knew from my District Six seminary days, took me aside to explain that he was
not a member of the Broederbond.
I made the DRC church leaders
evidently very uncomfortable by referring almost at the outset to Dr Beyers
Naudé. I stated quite bluntly my hope and expectation that they would attempt
to get the ban lifted. I had brought with me the draft of ‘Honger na
Geregtigheid’ in an open envelope. Taking for granted that the mail of the
Naudé’s was being tampered with, I naively requested them to take the envelope
along with them and hand it over personally.
Just as naively I expected that theologians would be open to take the
lead in repentance of the apartheid practices. Somehow God nevertheless blessed
my naive attempts.
Aftermath of the 1978 Visit
A ‘result’ of our visit to South Africa the previous year was that
Rosemarie was pregnant. We eagerly wanted more children. It was quite fitting
that a child was conceived just before our return to Holland and after I had
been reconciled to my home country.
But Rosemarie and Danny also
picked up jaundice at this time. The doctor intimated abortion as advisable
because of the great risk to the foetus. Rosemarie and I would not have
anything of that. Instead, we had to live for the next six months with the real
fear of a handicapped child to be born in August 1979.
7. Skirmishes in
Church Ranks
It
seemed almost inevitable that my views on biblical stewardship would cause
problems in church ranks. When
I suggested a reduction of my salary in order to have time free for my fight
against apartheid, the bomb exploded. I explained in my defence that I would not
use ‘church’ time to work on my treatise “Honger na Geregtigheid”. I was getting up at two o’clock in the morning
to work on that document. This made the Broederraad members only more
furious. They had hoped that I would rather make advocacy sacrifices for the
Surinam cause in Holland. My involvement
with the Moral Rearmament folk worsened
matters.
Almost unbearable Tension
The tension between the other church council members and me became
almost unbearable. When I saw an advertisement for a post with Scripture
Union, I applied promptly. On a Saturday at the end of January 1979, I was already
on my way to an interview for this post when a slippery condition on the roads
set in that we never experienced in the Netherlands before or after that day.
The interview never
took place. I knew that this was a clear ‘Jonah experience’ because I was basically
trying to run away from the problems in my church! God apparently wanted me to
prod on in my ministry in the Moravian congregation of Utrecht.
A kindred Spirit
Hein Postma was the principal of the local
Moravian school whom I got to know a little better when he addressed the
congregation at a love feast soon after our return from South Africa. He belonged to another
church fellowship, but since I had always put a high premium on the unity of
the body of Christ, Rosemarie and I soon attended a weekly Bible study together
with local Christians at this time under the leadership of Hein Postma and Wim
Zoutewelle, a Biology teacher at a local
Protestant school.
I sensed that Hein had a kindred spirit, the servant attitude of the 18th
century Herrnhut Moravians. After a few months I gave
him a copy of the A4 version of Honger na Geregtigheid’.
An untenable Position
My radicalism made my position untenable in other
ways. In my view the South African Moral Re-armament people and
the Moravian Church were too
compromising in their opposition to apartheid. In Holland I collided with my
minister colleagues when one of them aired that Europeans had no right to
oppose occult Surinamese traditions. I was appalled at how it was relativised:
‘They have their occultism and we have our materialism!’
However,
I was also hoping to get church congregants more or less on the same page with Rosemarie
and me regarding the importance of corporate prayer. (I had witnessed in the
early 1960s when Ds. Piet Bester came to Tiervlei how prayer changed the situation
in a congregation quite dramatically.)
I
put to the Broederraad quite strongly that we should start a weekly
prayer meeting. But the rift between my Broederraad and me was too wide
already at this point in time. The members agreed that I could go ahead, but
they would not participate. There were two other church members with whom I could
have started. But I still hoped that I could also get the members of the church
council to join. It was a serious mistake that I waited on them instead of
starting the prayer meeting as a threesome. (Rosemarie was of course time-wise
completely engaged by the care for our two-year old Danny.) Ultimately a
serious schism developed between my Broederraad and me that seemed almost unbridgeable.
Various
efforts were made to reconcile me to my church council. Also the ‘Centrale
Raad’ of the denomination launched an effort to this end. In a meeting with
Henk Esajas, the mediator, who was also a member of our congregation, I
suggested as a way out of the impasse
that we could start our church council meetings with an hour of Bible study. It
looked as if we had all won, when it was agreed – as a compromise - that we
would thereafter start our Broederraad meetings with a devotional half
hour. But the truce was only short lived!
The last Straw On August the 4th, 1979, our
second son was born, perfectly healthy. Fittingly, we gave him the name Rafael
which means God, the healer. My brother Windsor visited us at the time with his
wife Ray and their baby Kevin. An infant christening service was scheduled for
a September Sunday. That was the last service of this nature that I conducted. A
dispute with a church member just prior to this occasion made me very sensitive
to the issue of the christening of infants. (The person concerned expected me
to do my duties to christen their child without asking any questions. My Broederraad was very supportive however
in the matter, as were my minister colleagues.)
The issue of infant
'baptism' flared up soon thereafter. I was seriously challenged from Scripture regarding
this church practice. This was happening at the very time when I was suggesting
that stewardship should also include the scriptural testing of all church
traditions. During a Bible Study with Hein Postma and other believers,
Colossians 2:11,12 was read: “In him you were also circumcised... with the
circumcision done by Christ, having been buried with him in baptism and raised
with him through your faith...” Although baptism was not discussed at all
at this occasion. I was rattled for other reasons than had been discussed in
our church.
My
own Argument pulled from under me
My own argument for practising the tradition of
infant christening was pulled from under me. Subconsciously I was still somehow
influenced by a Calvinist argument in defence of infant christening. According
to this view, infant christening as the sign of the new covenant was a
substitute for the very highly revered Jewish ritual of circumcision,
the sign of the old covenant of God with Israel. I was
now reading there in Scripture about the circumcision of the heart. Aware that
we were speaking of infant christening as having come instead of the practice of circumcision, I was hit for a
six. From the biblical context it was clear that conversion through faith in
Jesus was meant. In the course of my participation in a
liturgical commission of the church I had already been troubled by the
formulation in the Moravian (infant) christening liturgy whereby eternal life
is apportioned to babies at their ‘baptism’. In theological parlance it is
called baptismal regeneration.
In the preceding years and following in the footsteps of Count
Zinzendorf, I somehow came to love Israel and the Jews. When I now had to consider
infant christening more deeply, the lack of a scriptural basis struck home. How
could we replace a practice so dear and sacred to the Jews? As I now also
studied the liturgy used at the christening of infants, I knew that I couldn’t
carry on with a practice that had indeed become a tradition that in my view nullifies
the power of God (Mark 7:13). The seed was simultaneously sown in my heart for
opposition to replacement theology, whereby the Church is said to have
substituted the nation of Israel. I was shocked to
discover that ‘circumcision of the heart’ - conversion to faith in Jesus
Christ - was the actual basis of baptism according to the above-mentioned Bible
verse.
Initial
Understanding and Support
This was now really
the last straw to me. How could I continue the practice with a good conscience?
I promptly put the problem to my Broederraad. The members were very sympathetic, especially after the sad common
experience only weeks prior to this. They suggested that I should discuss the
matter with my minister colleagues.
I
initially found understanding among the minister colleagues because they also
experienced irresponsible fatherhood among the Surinamese church members. It
was decided that we would organise a weekend to discuss the issue in depth with
all various church councils in the Netherlands because
also in other congregations there were similar problems. A main difficulty was
the lack of responsibility by men who fathered children outside of wedlock.
Taken
to Task
All my efforts to remind
the minister colleagues of our decision were in vain. It was soon evident that
they procrastinated on purpose. Nobody wanted to rock the boat, which could
have had international denominational repercussions.
Before such
a weekend could take place, my problem with infant ‘baptism’ was maliciously
conveyed to the church board in Germany. I was completely
taken by surprise by a phone call from the head office: ‘What is this that I
hear that you don’t want to baptize children anymore?’ I deduced that at
least one of my pastor colleagues had decided that I was too uncomfortable. I was taken to
task and finally referred to the bishop for counselling. This encounter with Bishop Helmut Reichel transpired in a very cordial spirit. I was appreciating that Bishop Reichel was treading in the footsteps
of Zinzendorf on the issue. He was convinced of the matter as he looked at
the grace of God operating ahead of us. But it didn’t solve my problem. In the end we found a compromise: I would continue as a minister
without having to christen infants.
Rosemarie and I now experienced the opposition and ostracism
in the church quite intensely. But the Lord encouraged us supernaturally. We
received a telegram from South Africa from our dear friend Kathy Schulze, who
was working with Scripture Union in
Cape Town at the time. She had no idea what we were experiencing. Kathy felt an inner urge to send us a telegram with the message:
‘I pray for you!’ What an encouragement that was to us!
Heaviness in
our Congregation
I
still sensed a strange heaviness whenever I preached in Utrecht. It was as if I
was speaking against an unseen wall of dark opposition. Yet, the Holy Spirit
must have spoken to some people because a complaint came in via a Broederraad
member. He deemed it important to convey that my sermons had ‘no content’. I
retorted that I could not understand why they got so upset if my sermons were
without any content. There must be something which troubled the person in
question. Then he replied: ‘Well, your sermon had the wrong content’. As I
probed further, it surfaced that it was the Bible reading on Ephesians 5 which
had been challenging sexual immorality. This was no new revelation. I was however
not prepared to dilute my sermons to satisfy sinful habits and desires.
Someone warned me to be careful what I would eat when
I was attending the various celebrations in the homes of the congregants. We
knew that this danger was real, because poisoning was something that did
happen in the culture in which we were moving. (In fact, in 1979 we took an
old Surinamese widow, into our home. Her husband had been poisoned.) But I
decided that I would not allow fear to govern my life, disregarding the warning
and just carried on with the ministry. We never heard whether someone did in
fact try to poison me.
An
Overdose of Medicine?
Around
this time our friend Hein Postma hereafter commented on my manuscript ‘Honger na Geregtigheid’.
He said quite lovingly that he missed love, forgiveness and compassion towards
Afrikaners. In his asessment the manuscript was tantamount to an overdose of
medicine to a sick patient.
In my spare time - i.e. during the
early morning hours - I started working at the revamping of ‘Honger na
Geregtigheid’ in three parts. The first part would focused on the Mixed Marriages Act, the legal
prohibition of racially mixed marriages, i.e. between a White and someone from
one of the other races. I gave it the title ‘Wat God saamgevoeg het.’ (What
God joined together)
There were also other
people who were not happy with ‘Honger na Geregtigheid’ such s my close
friend Jakes to whom I had sent a copy. He was unhappy for a completely different reason. Jakes felt that one
should not correspond or communicate with members of the apartheid government
at all. In his view the government should be isolated and treated like
outcasts! We agreed to differ, but it was not easy to discern that apartheid
was causing a strain on our friendship. His ‘second best friend’ was Allan
Boesak. Jakes’ views were apt to rub off on our common friend, who had become
quite influential by this time.[22]
8. Activism for racial Reconciliation
Rosemarie remained sceptical of my
correspondence with the apartheid authorities. She thought that I was wasting
my time, convinced that my letters would never reach the likes of Mr P.W. Botha
who had succeeded Mr John Vorster as State President.
This effectively put a break and a
damper on my spirit. Indeed, I had very little to show for all my efforts. Looking back, I am nevertheless thankful for
Rosemarie’s criticism. It kept me humble. I don’t know whether our family life
would have withstood the pressure of the prejudicial South African society in
the 1980s if we had returned to S.A. at that time.
One of the issues of which Rosemarie
was very critical was my emphasis on confession. Through our contacts with Moral Rearmament - where I was clearly
influenced - we had also seen that confession could be abused and that it can become
cheap, such as when folk use it to manipulate people. We learned that remorse
was a pre-condition and that it - as a rule - had to be followed with genuine
restitution. Nevertheless, I was encouraged by isolated positive news snippets
from S.A. that I picked up as I remained updated via the weekly international
edition of The Star.
Yet, I believed that some seed had been sown. Occasionally I thought to
have thankfully detected some change in outlook by the one or other Cabinet
minister.
An
activist Pen
One of the most dramatic developments transpired when Mr P.W. Botha,
the Prime Minister, made it plain that he was ready to scrap the (prohibition
of racially) Mixed Marriages Act.
Hoping that this could prepare our return to my home country, I was therefore
quite disappointed to hear that the Dutch
Reformed Church effectively pulled the break lever at their General Synod
of 1978. I wrote a letter to the editor of Rapport,
a Sunday newspaper in response. [23]
After our return to Holland in 1978,
I also wrote an article about our visit to South Africa in Nieuw Wereld
Nieuws, the Dutch Moral Rearmament
(MRA) periodical. Hereafter, discouraging news came from South Africa with
political implications. Howard Grace from the South African MRA, who had tried
to introduce me to Professor Heyns, wrote that the authorities had intercepted
the Dutch periodical with my article. In the same issue there was also a
radical article that sharply attacked apartheid as an un-Christian policy. It
was written under a pseudonym by Kgati Sathekge, one of the youths from
Atteridgeville, whom we had met on our previous visit to South Africa. (In
January 1979 Kgati was living with us in Zeist for a few days.) It was a sad
testimony to the slow pace of change that articles like his were viewed with
distrust.
Because different Cabinet ministers
had openly expressed their intention to move away from discrimination, I
secretly hoped that the government would agree to the publication of Honger
na Geregtigheid.
I noticed how influential people got
damaged spiritually when they came into the limelight prematurely. Very much
wary of this, I wanted to be certain that my autobiographical material would be
published in God’s timing and that he would be glorified by it. A letter to Dr Schlebusch, the
Minister of the Interior, was one of many ‘fleeces’
(Compare the story of Gideon in Judges 6:36-40) to ascertain whether I should
have my autobiographical material published at all. The curt reply of Dr Schlebusch was to me the sign that the climate was not yet ripe for the venture. I decided to abort
the publication attempt.
Drafting of Synod
Resolutions
I also got involved in the drafting of synod
resolutions and reports in 1979. Thus I also participated actively in a small lobby
to nudge the Moravian synod to boycott Shell, a Dutch-led multinational
company, because of its perceived role in supporting apartheid structures and
practice. It was no surprise that I was now regarded by many in the church as
an infante terrible in many quarters. Strange things happened like the
disappearance of draft resolutions that we had prepared for the synod in
Driebergen.
Correspondence with NGK ministers On
another track, I took the initiative to correspond with a few ministers of the Dutch Reformed Church in South Africa
about the race theology as laid down in their church policy papers on “Church and Race”.
After the airport ‘rendezvous’
with the NG Kerk church leaders,
some correspondence followed with Professor Heyns. I challenged him to include
theologians of colour like Dr Allan Boesak in the revision of a publication on
“church and race” of which Dr Heyns was the coordinator. Indirectly I hoped to
reconcile the two theologians, who were such influential church leaders. They
were respectively leaders of the Afrikaner ‘Broederbond’ and the ‘Broederkring’
(The latter institution consisted of Dutch
Reformed ministers and academics that came mainly from the disadvantaged
race groups. These ministers and academics opposed apartheid). I knew from our
student days how Allan had been raving about his lecturer, Dr Johan Heyns.
However, I was also aware that Dr Boesak had lashed out publicly at his former
lecturer, e.g. in the Christian Institute
journal Pro Veritate. In the meantime I continued to target Dutch Reformed theologians of South
Africa whom I believed could play a pivotal role in change for the better in my
home country.
Some reports in the press
gave the impression that the government wanted to abolish the “Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act”, but
that the Dutch Reformed Church would
not agree to it. My correspondence with some of their prominent theologians
did not seem to make any headway.
An Activist for racial Reconciliation In 1980 I was especially activist with my letter writing. It started
with a letter in reaction to an editorial of the Star in February of
that year after a kidnapping incident in Silverton on the Reef, purportedly
perpetrated by ANC ‘terrorists’. I wrote: “I missed in your editorial any
discussion of the merit of releasing political prisoners like Mandela”, adding
“Don’t you dare to condemn the attitude of the ANC when its officials are
being quoted as saying ‘they will kill all the hostages next time’?” It
seemed as if the ANC had decided to go for all-out insurrection, including the
taking and killing of hostages.
In March 1980 I posted
a copy of my letter to the editor (of The Star) to Reg September of the
ANC head office in Lusaka who had visited us in our home in Zeist, as well as
to Prime Minister Botha. In the letter to the ANC office I challenged the Lusaka
ANC leader: “I pray that (at a possible release of Nelson Mandela and
others?) the ANC can be brought back to the original course set out by people
like Chief Albert Luthuli - a course of racial reconciliation, together with
the appreciation of the intrinsic value of every human being... Oh, I do want
to pray that South Africa might become a driving force for God’s justice and
peace!” He replied in August 1981, expressing disappointment ‘that a man with your talent fails to help
people to fight back, to struggle for that which is right. For after all, it
must be clear that there is really no alternative to the complete
dismantling of the present regime in S.A. It must be destroyed
so that something clean can be born, a new S.A. in which all our pecple
can live in peace and harmony. To plead with the fascist is to plead with the
devil himself. He has to be isolated and in the process we have to find, and
shall find more and more people who see through the futility of talking to
these murderers.“ This depicts fairly accurately the opinions of my counterparts
in the Church who had given up on any dialogue with the rulers of the day.
In early April my next letter went
to Mr Botha, the Prime Minister. It was a mild protest against the confiscation
of the passports of Bishop Tutu and Dr Allan Boesak. I was tempted to
relinquish my own passport, but thankfully refrained from doing it. That would
have been a carnal reaction based on anger. I was nevertheless quite happy that
the passports were returned to both of them soon thereafter.
Love
drives out Fear
My previous idea that
apartheid could be reformed had undergone a complete metamorphosis by this time.
It probably started already on June 16, 1976. In July 1980, I was driven into
action once again after I had read about the arrest of friends like Paul Joemat,
my old Moravian musketeer soul-mate. I was now convinced that the country was
being led to a catastrophic precipice through actions like these. I wrote a
lengthy article with the title Liefde dryf die vrees uit.[24]
This article was originally intended as a challenge in which I critically
discussed a few of the government policies, with the aim of getting it printed
in one of the big Afrikaans daily newspapers.
Using 1 John 4:18 as my point of
departure, I opined in ‘Liefde dryf die vrees uit’ that the apartheid
laws were based on fear and they therefore had no future. Instead, the
authorities should give love and trust a chance. The article was possibly too
lengthy for anyone of the Afrikaans papers to consider it seriously, unless
possibly as a series. Seeing that it opposed government policy diametrically
and drastically, not a single one of the big four Afrikaans daily morning
papers to which I had sent the article, showed any interest. I was possibly too
radical, referring to the (traffic) sign of the cul-de-sac as a deformed cross. I stated that apartheid opposed the
message of the cross; that it was basically diabolic and a cul-de-sac because it was separating people, whereas the nature of
God is to join human beings. In this article I also suggested confession to be
a pre-requisite to reconciliation.
When I also read that Mr Botha would
have a meeting with church leaders on 9 August 1980, I pointed out to him in a
letter dated 22 July 1980 that some of those people who had been arrested were
friends of my youth days. They were committed Christians who never would have
considered violent solutions for the political problems of our country. I also referred
to some of the young people who had fled the country after the 1976 and 1977
clampdown of the government. I surmised that the increase of sabotage and insurrection
was a result of these government actions. I also included with that post a copy
of ‘Liefde dryf die vrees uit.”
A copy of that document was also
posted to Bishop Tutu, who was the General Secretary of the South African Council of Churches at
that time. In the accompanying letter to Bishop Tutu I wrote: ‘It is my
conviction that the South African churches in general should confess their
collective guilt with regard to racism, as an aid to the government to do the
same’
Attempts
at Mediation
As a part
of my perceived ministry of reconciliation I also aimed at trying to heal rifts
where I discerned them. In the international weekly edition of
the ‘Star’ I was reading one day about a major rift between Allan Boesak and Bishop
Desond Tutu. The camp of Boesak was angry at the likes of Tutu who were still
prepared to talk to President Botha. I
promptly attempted to reconcile (the later Arch)bishop Tutu and Dr Allan Boesak.
In letters to both church
leaders, I appealed to them to get their act together because it was absolutely
counter-productive in the opposition to the abhorrent race policies. I did not
get an answer from either of the two, but I was quite happy to read later that
they were on speaking terms again. In fact, in due course they were seen
sharing the same platform.
The issue at stake however also
affected me personally when my correspondence with the government estranged me
to some extent from my close friend Jakes.
My effort to bring Boesak and Heyns
together was unsuccessful. However, my letter to Allan and correspondence with
the government not only earned me the wrath of Allan. In April 1980 I
apologised to Allan for bringing the Broederkring and Broederbond
in such close proximity, but I did not receive any reply. I had no remorse
about that initially, but I only discovered the hurt that I could have caused
by my critical remarks in March 2007, when I looked again at the content of
that letter. I possibly deserved to be cold-shouldered. (Later I remembered
another incident with which I may have also angered him.)
Dr Heyns
went on to become one of the instruments of change in the 1980s, leading his
denomination away from apartheid thinking and attitudes. It is generally
accepted that a right wing extremist, who could not come to terms with Heyns’
role in the dramatic turn-around of the denomination, was responsible for his
assassination in November 1994.
Stay
put in ‘Jerusalem’!
On a
personal level, I was allowed to continue operating as a minister due to the
intervention of Bishop Reichel, without having to christen infants. This could
of course not go on for any length of time. I was offered another post, but the
issue of radical stewardship had become quite important to me. I could not
accept a post where I perceived that I would be required to compromise significantly
on that issue. I decided to terminate my services in the Moravian Church at the end of 1980.
At this stage we called to the Lord
for a word as guidance. We were surprised when Luke 24:47 came through. The
verse mentioned ‘stay in Jerusalem’. It was not clear to us how to interpret
it. We thought to understand it to mean that we should remain living in Zeist.
But that seemed impossible! From two other groups we had firm promises that we
could join them if we would have no place to go to. But nothing was forthcoming
from either of them when push came to shove. My work and residence permit for
Holland was valid until September 1981. However, if someone would have
suggested that we would still live on the Broederplein of Zeist a year
later (in fact, finally until January 1992) I might have been tempted to regard
that person to be insane.
Other developments led to
preparations for another trip to my home country. In due course the second
draft of ‘Wat God saamgevoeg het’ was cyclostyled in English translation
with a limited number of copies, although my hope was still to get an Afrikaans
version printed in South Africa first.
Nerve-wrecking Weeks
Something else had happened in the meantime.
Rommel Roberts, whom we had originally met at Caux, the main centre of Moral Rearmament in Switzerland in 1977,
had just fled the country. The S.A. police was hunting him because of his
involvement with the bus and school boycotts at the Cape earlier that year
(1980). After Rommel’s studies to become a Catholic priest, he sensed a calling
to engage himself in social work with the Modderdam ‘squatter camp’ (informal
settlement) community. In the course of this involvement he met Celeste Santos,
a ‘White’ nun. They fell in love with each other. Yet, unlike other couples in
the same predicament, they did not go and marry outside the country. (Such
couples would thereafter either live in exile or in a double life of secrecy). Rommel
and Celeste got married in the Holy Cross
Church Roman Catholic Church in District Six, thus flouting all local
customs and the law that prohibited marriage between a White and someone from
one of the other races. Their marriage was thus of course ‘illegal’.
Rommel and Celeste were very
courageous, defying many prevalent South African mores as they continued their ministry,
resisting the apartheid government. When Rommel was imprisoned in the course of
the struggle, Celeste would just go and visit her husband at the Victor Verster
prison in Paarl as if this was the most usual thing to do (This is the same
prison from which Nelson Mandela was released in 1990).
When the couple came to visit us in
Zeist, Celeste was pregnant. While they were with us, she became seriously ill.
A complication in the pregnancy not only extended their stay in Zeist, but
Celeste also came close to losing her life because of it.
Due to her
illness and hospitalization, Celeste lived with us much longer than they had
originally intended. That was the factual situation in August 1980 when we
received sad news from South Africa. My sister Magdalene had contracted
leukaemia.
We started enquiring after the cheapest possibility to
go to South Africa as a family. (We initially thought that I could go to South Africa
alone to be there simultaneously for my mother’s pending 70th birthday
on 28 December. But the date was far from convenient. There were so many other
complicating factors militating against it. I still had two weeks of holiday
due to me. But one could hardly expect any church council to allow their
minister to leave just before Christmas.
We decided finally to go to South
Africa as a family as a step of faith. The special circumstances around my
sister’s condition changed matters so much that the Broederraad released
me compassionately from duties at Christmas time. We booked in faith with
little left in terms of savings. Another problem cropped up. The visa for
Rosemarie did not arrive in time.
Agonizing Days
Celeste was back with us after visiting some other
people in the Netherlands. Together we experienced the agonizing days of
waiting in vain on the visas for Rosemarie and the children. We shared our
uncertainty with Celeste in respect of our going to South Africa. We would be
using just about our last savings for the trip and I still had no employment
after our return from South Africa. The day on which we were required to pay
the deposit to reserve our seats, I phoned the Embassy once more. The official
suggested that I phone someone in South Africa to contact Pretoria. The travel
agency gave us an extension of an extra day to procure the visas.
I couldn’t phone my relatives of
course, because we didn’t want to cause any more anxiety there. But we were
happy that it was a Thursday. Now we could share our burden in the evening with
Hein Postma and the other believers of our Bible study and prayer group in
Zeist.
Our friend Jakes,
whom I phoned, used a method with which I would not have been happy if I had
known what he would do. The phone call of Jakes to Pretoria went along the
following lines:
“I am a friend of Reverend Ashley
Cloete in Holland. I want to contact the press straight away, but I just want
to check out whether it is true that you don’t want to allow him and his family
to come and visit his sister who has contracted cancer...”
Of course, the government could not
allow such an embarrassment without any ado, especially since we were still
abroad. Therefore it was not surprising when the answer came promptly:
“Sir, I shall investigate the
matter straight away. I’m sure it will come in order.”
Visas granted
We received the visas for
Rosemarie literally on the last minute. We could hereafter finalize our
travelling plans. But it was too late to get booked on an onward flight from
Johannesburg to Cape Town.
Although
we knew by now that strange conditions could be attached to visas, we were
overjoyed. And it was so special that we could share our joy with Celeste. The
preliminary knowledge about the granting of the visas was already such a
special gift to us. At the same time it was also a confirmation to venture out
in faith into the unknown. We were encouraged to trust God for our future and
for our everyday needs.
The only conditions attached to the visas turned out
to be that we had to pay the telex costs and that we had to obtain a letter
from the travelling agency to certify that we had bought return tickets. The
stage was set for our next trip.
In
the following three weeks the big priority was to get employment. I hoped to
take up teaching again after our return from South Africa. Some posts for Religious
Instruction seemed fitted to my previous experiences, but expanding
unemployment was also taking its toll in Holland. When we left for South
Africa, my hopes were pinned on one single application where I had survived the
first round of nineteen applicants. But it was not cut and dried at all. There
were still nine other applicants in the running for the vacant post.
Temporarily
back in South Africa
We had no option than
to sleep over in Johannesburg. The
conditions under which our visit to the Cape would took place, were
nevertheless far from pleasant. We were basically going to see my dying sister
and we had no idea what would happen on our return to Holland.
It suited me perfectly that my
seminary colleague Martin October, with whom we lodged in the Moravian
parsonage, was quite willing to take me to Dr Beyers Naudé on our return to
Holland.
I phoned Dr Beyers Naudé fairly soon after our arrival in Johannesburg.
When I heard from the illustrious banned brother in Christ that he had never
received the manuscript that I had sent with the delegation of DRC theologians
the previous year, I was all the more keen to discuss my manuscript with Dr Naudé.
On arrival at D.F. Malan Airport (the name of the international airport
of Cape Town at that time) we heard that my sister had died the previous
evening.
In a series of events prior to our scheduled return to Holland, we
discerned God’s hand clearly. This happened especially during the evening
devotion of 19 January 1981 in Elim. My late father was reading the scriptural
Macedonian injunction: ‘Kom oor en help ons!’ (Come over and help us.)
The immanent passing on of our dear mother, who was quite ill at that time, was
anticipated. Rosemarie was also deeply moved when she saw how our brother‑in‑law
Anthony was struggling after the death of his beloved wife, our late
sister. Very much against my own selfish
will, we decided to stay in Cape Town for another week.
9. Uncompassionate Activism
By this time I had
become a hardened anti‑apartheid activist. The only constraint was that I waged
my opposition from a religious platform. I had been believing for some time
already that the unity of the body of believers in Jesus Christ would be all‑important
in this struggle against apartheid. I was encouraged very much in this regard by
the unity of a multi‑racial group from different churches in Stellenbosch that
had been started by Professor Nico Smith and a few pastors. On the other hand however,
the activist anti‑apartheid spirit made me uncompassionate.
Another Jonah Experience
When people at the Cape heard that I had no employment in Holland, they
asked me why we did not stay longer.
With my reputation as one of the better Mathematics teachers in
‘Coloured’ schools and the dearth of qualified people in that subject, many
thought that I could easily get a post.
But I was not to be moved to stay longer in Cape Town. I wanted to move
on to Johannesburg to meet Dr
Beyers Naudé. Not even the possibility of my mother passing
on soon could move me ‑ and the real possibility that I would not see any of my
parents alive again. God had to step in.
And that he did. On the afternoon that would have been our final time
together, my dear friend Jakes was at hand to take us to the Strandfontein
beach. A strong South Easter was blowing there.
We were due to take the train to the Reef in the evening. This time we
had been given permission to travel in the same compartment as a family without
any ado, contrary to the previous occasion when our little son and I had been
made honorary ‘Whites’. (This was one of the major factors that had embittered
me so much in 1978 that I did not want to return to the country again).
After we had arrived in Sherwood Park at the home of the Esau family, we
got ready to go to the train station. However, the train tickets were nowhere
to be found. I must have lost them in Strandfontein. With the strong wind that
had been blowing there, it would have been futile to go back and try to find
them. I knew that God had caught up with me. Just like Jonah once, I was trying
to run away from the responsibility to my parents and the bereaved Esau family.
The Holy Spirit had thankfully softened me up by now. Hesitantly I
agreed to stay in Cape Town for another week. My parents were pleasantly
surprised when we pitched up in Elim once again. This time we had interesting
news for them. We had decided to extend our stay in South Africa, unless I was
successful with my application for the Religious Instruction teaching post in
Utrecht (Holland).
After the extra week in Cape Town, everything was cut and dried. God had
confirmed that we should try and stay for another six months. The church in
Holland graciously agreed that we could leave our furniture in the parsonage in
Zeist. A new pastor had not yet been appointed as my successor. The air tickets
we had bought could not be changed or reimbursed. I had to take a teaching post
in order to earn some money with which we could buy new tickets.
Teaching in
Hanover Park
I knew that Mount View High School
was one of the two schools where the boycotts had started the year before. I
felt uneasy however when the ‘Coloured Affairs’ regional authorities expressed
some satisfaction to place me at that school. I felt abused when it seeped
through that the Department thought that the use of a clergyman could perhaps
quell the unrest at the school where a colleague had been dismissed for
‘unprofessional conduct.’
After my appointment at
Mount View High School my presence
almost caused ‘tangible’ tension. Understandably teacher colleagues and
learners were possibly thinking that I was a government informer. The fact that
the school was confronted with the strange story of a teacher who came from
Holland and a sister who had passed away must have sounded very suspect.
The teacher I was replacing
had the fairly common surname Cloete. The reason became all too soon. The
Cape Herald reported how my predecessor had been sacked for disseminating
ANC pamphlets. It was therefore almost
logical for everyone at the school to see me as an informer, a collaborator
with the hated regime.
Initially we slept in the backyard of the bereaved Esau family in a
caravan that belonged to our friend Richard Arendse, my classmate of high
school days and a later teacher colleague. From the Esau backyard we tried to render
some support to the family. My brother Windsor from Grabouw generously put the
use of one of their two cars at our disposal so that we could visit my sickly
and ageing parents in Elim frequently. It was very special to see our mother
recovering slowly and the diminishing strain was evidently also doing our Daddy
a lot of good.
A Close Call
The Mount View Sendingkerk was started to serve the members of the Hanover
Park township. The home of Jakes and Ann
Jacobs, the manse of the congregation,
was situated in Penlyn Estate. Over the week-ends it was a bee-hive of
activity.
Two Moravian minister friends Chris Wessels and Henry Engel,
who were studying at the University of
the Western Cape, would come there on many a Friday afternoon where I often
joined them.[25] The
Broederkring met there quite often on
a Sunday evening. I was rather naive not to consider that the Special Branch of the Police, the
equivalent of Hitler’s Gestapo, could be monitoring who was attending these
meetings at the manse in Penlyn Estate. We had to expect that attendees would be harassed at
the very least.
I did not notice that I was followed when I
drove back to Sherwood Park where the Esau family lived from one of these Broederkring meetings. (Sherwood Park is located adjacent to the notorious township Manenberg).
We were still awaiting the outcome of our request for the extension of the
visas of Rosemarie and the children. That could still be turned down. With my
track record of opposition to the government, the granting of visas for them
could not be taken for granted.
The
next day Rosemarie noticed a strange car parked nearby around the time when I
would usually come home from school. My movements were obviously recorded by shady
folk. Just on that particular morning however, the car of my brother Windsor
that we were using, would not start. I took a lift with my brother-in-law
Anthony who was lecturing at Hewat
Training College. I came back by bus in the afternoon, much later than
usual. The Special Branch driver possibly lost patience when I did not arrive
at the usual time. Who knows what one of the cronies of notorious Spyker van
Wyk might have done if I had done so. (It was transpiring at a time when his
torture methods were known. Furthermore people who opposed apartheid could disappear
mysteriously. That happened initially to our friend Chris Wessels who
thankfully survived the ordeal. ).
Accommodation Challenges
As the nights became colder in March, it became imperative to move out
of the caravan. Our one-and a half-year-old Rafael suffered from a constant cold.
However, the politics of the day prevented us from finding accommodation in a
‘White’ residential area for three months. Not even our church was prepared to
risk letting us live in a vacant parsonage in Newlands, a ‘White’ residential
area where the church had been accommodating White families, e.g. missionaries
from overseas. (Given my rebel record of defying authorities, the reticence of
the Church Board can be easily understood. They could never be sure whether we
would later decide to embarrass them by wanting to stay on! We were by this
time also known to have been often in the company of Rommel and Celeste, the
political ‘rebel couple’. I had become a liability to the denomination, perhaps
making it difficult for the leaders in their dealings with the government. That
I had resigned because of the christening of babies was of course also a hot
patatoe. Helping us could have been interpreted as support for a prime
dissident.)
We declined the repeated
invitation of Rommel and Celeste to come and share their house with them. They
were however not only known as political activists, but just like us they were also
a racially mixed couple. To accept their offer would have meant inviting
trouble with the police. All other efforts to get temporary accommodation
failed. We finally had no other excuse available to turn down their generous
offer. Very hesitantly we moved into the three-bedroom cottage in Haywood Road,
Crawford with our two small boys, to join Rommel, Celeste, Alan and Wally. (The
latter two are brothers of Rommel.)
Cross‑Cultural Contacts
In Crawford I was now living for the first time in my life in a ‘White’
residential area. We started attending Living Hope Baptist Church, a fellowship that I would possibly not have chosen
voluntarily. That it was purported to be non-racial attracted us initially but
it was quite a struggle for me to remain there, especially during the first few
weeks when I felt rejected at this so-called non‑racial fellowship. I turned out to be the only
person with a darker skin pigmentation. It
became nevertheless a spiritually healthy personal experience when I had to discover
that I was not yet completely free from my own racial prejudice.
At the very next Sunday I
decided to drop my family there and then attend the Moravian Church in
Bridgetown where my seminary student colleague Kallie August was the pastor.
When I wanted to drop Rosemarie and Danny at the St Giles premises in Mowbray, where the Living Hope Baptist fellowship congregated, our four-year son Danny
cried bitterly. I sensed that the Lord was speaking to me. This time I was obedient,
staying with my wife and son.
I missed out on a
golden opportunity to make a meaningful contribution to racial reconciliation
via the Living Hope Baptist Church through my disobedience in the
following weeks. Had I attended the mid-week prayer meetings of the fellowship
it would have been more convincing that my political stance was not my main
driving motive.
An Expression of Contextual
Theology
During the short spell of teaching at Mount View High School (Hanover Park) in 1981, I had quite a
percentage of Muslim learners in my classes.
Just after Easter, Mr Cassie, the
school principal, asked me to address the school assembly in the weekly
devotional exercise. In my mini sermon I stressed that Mary Magdalene had
previously been an outcast, demon‑possessed before she became a follower of
Jesus. The learners of the despised township could obviously fully identify
with the message that I shared. I furthermore highlighted in my sermonette that
the outcast Mary Magdalene was the first evangelist of the resurrection of
Jesus according to John’s Gospel. This was solid Contextual Theology. In my
talk I challenged the township learners and teacher colleagues, stressing that
this could only happen to Mary Magdalene because she had first committed her
life to Jesus as her Lord. Of course, that was down to earth evangelical stuff.
Be it as it may, this sermonette harvested for me acceptance from the learners
in the highly politicised school. I was quite
deeply touched to see how open the Muslim learners were to the radical claims
of Jesus.
Risks galore
Celeste approached Rosemarie to assist a Black
teacher as a volunteer with the teaching of retarded children in a Catholic
school in Nyanga. In those days it was illegal for a ‘Coloured’
or a ‘White’ to go into the ‘Black’ areas without a permit. Expecting that it
would have been refused any way, we never even considered requesting for
one. (It is highly debatable at any rate
whether one should apply for a permit under such conditions.) Rosemarie obliged
after some deep contemplation, but sensed ultimately that she had to be
obedient to an opportunity for special service. She felt that she had to make a
choice between being obedient to God or the government. She chose for the
former but every day she was intimidated by a red car that would be following her
close enough to make her aware of it that she was being watched.
Because
of my own involvement at school or in the volatile Crossroads community where
we supported Rommel, Celeste and Alan Roberts with harassed ‘illegal’ Black
women,[26]
there was the real possibility that any one of us could have been arrested by
the police. Of course, we were basically working towards racial reconciliation.
We were nevertheless walking on a dangerous tight-rope!
Our personal experiences and
involvement in political turmoil during the first half of 1981 caused intense resentment
in Rosemarie towards South Africa as a possible country to reside in. On more
than one occasion we experienced from close range how the political climate in
the country would heat up to near boiling point.
At Mount View High School my ability at teaching Mathematics gradually
became evident to all and sundry. Some of the teachers and students also noticed
by now that it was ‘possibly true’ that I had a German wife. (Now and then Rosemarie would pick
me up at the school with the car that my brother Windsor and his wife had put at
our disposal. Normally I commuted to school from nearby Haywood Road in
Crawford by bicycle. I had bought myself a cheap second-hand one.) She also joined me to
Hanover Park in protest when I decided to stand with students on June 1 - in quiet
protest with a programme of alternative teaching on the ‘compulsory holiday’ (On
this day the police actually stepped in when a few learners entered the school
premises, defying the threat of the school inspector that anybody found on the
school premises that day would be heavily fined.) It
was quite satisfying to discern that the teacher colleagues and the children
had started to trust me.
Before long I got
politically embroiled in the volatile situation at the school during the June
16 commemoration. We as teachers who stayed away were required to write letters
explaining our absence. I was I in no mood to write an apologetic letter. My
activist letter got me barred from teaching again in South Africa, unless I
would return to the authorities cap in hand. I was not ready for that under any
circumstances.[27]
Spadework for the
Battle of Nyanga
Because of government policy the separation of
Black families developed into a cancerous tradition in South African society.
We were privileged to have been involved with the spadework that prepared ‘the
battle of Nyanga’. Alan Roberts, the brother of Rommel, interviewed the ladies
who had been taken out of the homes to the Roman
Catholic Church of Langa where they would live for a few weeks. I was
deeply moved as I typed the stories of the suffering Black people whom the
government was trying to remove forcibly. It was strategic that I had copies of
these stories after they had mysteriously disappeared at the court hearings.
But this did not help after all. One after the other the women were found
guilty, due to be ‘deported’ to the Transkei, where some of them had never been
before. But that was regarded by government decree as their ‘homeland’. These
women had been ‘illegally born’ at the Cape.
Tense Weeks
Rosemarie valiantly
joined me with our two little children in dangerous ventures, e.g. going with
me to Crossroads when I was part of a protesting Church delegation. (We
advocated on behalf of a busload of ‘illegal’ Black women that had returned
from the Transkei, very much against the wishes of the government.[28])
During these tense weeks we had to reckon with the possibility of getting arrested
all the time. On two occasions we risked getting shot by the police or by an
army unit.
During the preceding months
the going was rather tough as we had to struggle through all sorts of apartheid
red tape. Then there had been the indifferent attitude of locals and that of
the churches. When we tried to find accommodation, everybody we had approached
- apart from Rommel and Celeste - seemed to fear breaking through the racist
customs.
Yet, we still had high hopes
that the Church intervention on behalf of the Crossroads inhabitants
would lead to some change in government policy. The threats of the Bantu Administration Board put all of us
who were living under the same roof in Haywood Road in Crawford under severe
pressure, but even more so this was the case with the Black women from Crossroads
and the informal KTC settlement.
Church Intervention on behalf of Crossroads
Inhabitants
It was quite strategic that I could
get the DRC Sendingkerk minister of
Wynberg, Jan de Waal, to be part of a clergy delegation for the ongoing
negotiations with the Bantu
Administration Board. On a Friday
morning a few weeks before we returned to Holland, a group of pastors met the top
official of the Bantu Administration
Board. The uneasy official seemed to be taken aback initially, starting off
very apologetically and saying that he had to see that the laws of the country
were being obeyed. This prompted one of the ministers to mention that God’s law
should get greater priority.
Temporary reprieve for the
hapless women was achieved and the Anglican Archbishop would get an audience
with the responsible Cabinet Minister. Indeed, after the audience of Archbishop
Bill Burnett with Minister Piet Koornhof, our friends Celeste and Nomangezi
received ‘confidential concessions’ from the government on 15 June 1981,
allowing the Crossroads women to stay at the Cape. At least this battle seemed
to have been won.
Only
one Prayer left
Towards
the end of our stay at the Cape Rosemarie had more than enough of it all. She had
apparently completely forgotten her vow of 1978. After
all the traumatic experiences she had only one prayer left: ‘Lord, I am prepared to serve you anywhere in
the world as long as it is not South Africa!’
In the process I became quite
embittered once again. Celeste mentioned that someone wanted to organise an interview for me
with Mr P.W. Botha, the Prime Minister. Some ‘White’
friends also wanted to introduce us to Helen Suzman, the Jewish parliamentarian
who was such a stalwart fighter for justice. But I was not interested in any
special favours. Our involvement with the Blacks created in me a resistance of
another sort. So very much aware that Black families were being forcefully and brutally separated, I was not interested
any more to go to the government or anyone for that matter - cap in hand - for
the ‘privilege’ to live in my home country with my family. Why should I get a
special privilege to live in South Africa with my wife and children when
thousands of other families were being ripped apart?
Rosemarie and I
returned to Holland with our two children quite divided on the issue of where
we should be living. I still yearned to return to my home country, even though
I knew that it was well‑neigh impossible. Rosemarie was very happy that we
could get out of the threatening hearth physically unharmed. But we knew that
God had initially brought us together as a couple and that we had to be called
as a family unit to whatever country He would choose. Way back at our first
date in 1970, at the end of my stint as a student in Germany, God had used the
call to missions to confirm in my heart that Rosemarie was the person I wanted
as my future wife. Since then the importance of a common calling only
increased. Thus we never even considered going separate ways because of any
divisive issue at hand.
Publication of What God joined together’?
During our six-month
stay in the country I updated and improved Wat God saamgevoeg het. Some
of my friends put pressure on me to publish the material to expose the
government. I almost succumbed to the temptation when Hein Fransman, who is
married to a cousin and who had a link to Kampen publishers in Holland,
approached me. He showed eagerness to get involved in such a publication, but I
was not so sure whether that would be a good move. Hein had already published
material of Allan Boesak. I feared that such a publication might prove
counter-productive in terms of my intention, namely to love my ‘enemies’, to
win over the hearts of the Afrikaners.
Embarrassing the government was not what I intended. I believed that the
more loving way was not to expose the wrongs of the rulers, but rather to win
over my ‘enemies’. I presented the English draft of ‘What God joined
together’ to Tafelberg
Uitgewers, with the proviso that the book would be printed in Afrikaans
first if they would accept it for publication. (In 2015 the initial objective,
to win over the hearts of Afrikaners, had become obsolete. We printed some
copies in a low-key private way.[29])
I was following the
developments in the country closely.
Even though I had no proof that my actions had contributed in any way, I
did sense satisfaction when the law that prohibited people from different races
to marry, was finally repealed in 1985. Spiritually I still had to learn a lot,
e.g. that God was more interested in my relationship with Him than in my
actions. Of course, I regarded my political activism as an important part of my
service for Him, a necessary ingredient of an effort to get the races
reconciled to each other.
10. Leaving our Jerusalem?
Shortly after our
return to Holland in July 1981 we
got in a tight corner after a journalist of Trouw,
a reputable newspaper, had interviewed me. Information was printed about the
Crossroads saga that we had specifically asked him not to publish. He did not
mention my name, but it would not have been difficult for the South African
information service to find the source. Thankfully the ‘Battle of Nyanga’ and
the subsequent ‘first major defeat of the apartheid government’ on the issue
got into the international media anyway shortly thereafter. Thus we could continue
to remain in the background. Looking back, I think that my opposition to the
government was much more effective that way.[30]
A very difficult Period
A very difficult period in our lives started. In
Zeist we virtually had only one option left, namely to pack our belongings because my work permit for Holland was expiring in September 1981. The work
permit had been linked to my position as a pastor of the Moravian Church. We had completely forgotten the Word from
Scripture that we should remain in our “Jerusalem” (Zeist). Yet, we had no
drive or motivation to start packing at all. (The church had offered us
temporary accommodation in Bad Boll where we started our marriage.)
We still had not packed
a thing when I applied for a teaching post in Religious Instruction. And then
it happened: I got a temporary teaching post at the College Blauwcapel in Utrecht virtually on the last minute, just
before the expiry date of my work permit.
When my successor as the new pastor for Utrecht was finally appointed,
it turned out to be someone who possessed his own house. Thus we did not even
have to leave the big Broederplein home, from where many a ministry would
evolve. We discovered that God had sovereignly overruled. We could remain in
Zeist, our Jerusalem.
The next few years I applied for
numerous teaching vacancies in Holland, many of them temporary ones. Amid the
uncertainty of permanent employment, our daughter Magdalena Erika - named after
my late sister and Rosemarie’s mother - was born on 17 March 1982.
Joining another Church?
We had no intention
of joining another church when we left Zeist for South Africa at the end of
1980. When we returned in July 1981, a few spiritual ‘siblings‘ had decided in
our absence to start a new fellowship. I was not happy at all that they had
already decided to have services on a Sunday morning. I had no problems with
the idea of a new fellowship as such, but I detested the concomitant idea of
competition. Weren’t there already enough churches in Zeist? Yet, it was still
a long way off before I discerned that Church disunity and a competitive spirit
among fellowships are actually demonic strongholds. I would have preferred to attend
a fellowship on a Saturday so that adherents could still attend a church of their
choice on Sundays.[31]
What
I liked especially about the new fellowship in Zeist was that there was no
formal membership. The idea of dual membership that we brought along from the Moravian Church in Germany, appealed to
me. (There some church members still
belonged to the Lutheran State Church.) At any rate, we simply remained members
of the Moravian Church. On both sides
people were unhappy, but we were not to be deterred. Every Saturday evening one
would find me joining the traditional Moravian ‘Zangdienst’ (Evensong)
and on Sunday evening I enjoyed the spiritually enriching and uplifting Moravian liturgies and litanies that
were constantly updated by our neighbour Hans Rapparlié.
Denominational Fragmentation
hitting Home
We had friends in the
mission agency Youth with a Mission (YWAM) where the American couple Floyd
and Sally McClung were leading proceedings. From the YWAM base at Heidebeek our
close friends Dennis and Jo Fahringer had been challenging us to come and join
them when I resigned as pastor of the Moravian
Church. It was quite a blessing to me to discern how God was using
foreigners to bring the Dutch Church back on track. Jeff Fountain, another
YWAMer who hailed from New Zealand, also raved about the Moravians and their
history.
I made it very difficult for my wife
because I was also quite radical in other ways. In Berlin we had met a couple,
Mike and Linda Saylor from Santa Barbara (USA), who saw themselves as tent
maker missionaries. Their home church had been inspired by the history of Zinendorf
and the 18th century Moravians. We became close friends, later meeting other
missionaries from their home church who were minisering bi-vocationally in
Europe. Through them we got to know Linda’s father, Gene Edwards, who was not
yet the famous author he would later become. Through them we got to know
Linda’s father, Gene Edwards, who was not yet the famous author he would later
become. (On a visit to Düsseldorf a year or two later, Gene asked me whether I
thought that the Moravian Church
could ever be revived to its former glory. I could not foresee this
possibility, but the question would haunt me for quite a while.)
In 1980 I was asked to deliver the
sermon at the annual mission festival when Surinamese folk converged on the
Zusterplein of Zeist. I took the opportunity to challenge them to use the gifts
of hospitality in the Netherlands to be a blessing. I highlighted how God used
foreigners in the Bible. But it was also my swan song. It was known that I had
resigned, about to stop ministering in Utrecht at the end of that year.
The renowned Professor Verkuyl
highlighted the glorious past of our spiritual ancestors as our guest speaker
at the special centenary mission festival in Zeist the following year. I could
not resist my tears as I had to compare what he said with the sad state that
was prevailing in the denomination where I had become an outsider.
A
new Fellowship in Zeist At the new fellowship in Zeist many of our
friends like Hein Postma and Wim Zoutewelle were involved. The new church that
we had started attending, which had no formal membership, moved to a little
hall in “Panweg” a few months after its inception. The group that
consisted of some of the Christians, with whom we had been enjoying Thursday
evening Bible Study meetings, was committed to unity of the Body of Christ and
evangelization. Among these believers there was also Geertje Kalmijn-Rehorst who
had just returned from Austria with her two sons Peter and Hans. The parental
couple had been missionaries in Vienna before estrangement and divorce
followed.
The tragedy of
denominational fragmentation really hit home to us on Sunday mornings when we
set out for the new fellowship where I was soon asked to join the leadership
team. We felt the pain of the church separation anew when Anneco Adriaanse, a
good friend, came to live with us. She had taken employment in our vicinity.
She preferred to attend the Full Gospel fellowship that worshipped in
Figi, one of the local cinemas. (Anneco was still a remnant of our connection
to Moral Rearmament. We had met her
at their base in Johannesburg in 1978. Like us, she had become estranged from
the MRA movement. We discovered that the atoning death of Jesus was not central
in the thinking of the organization, because they also tried to accommodate
other religions by compromising that doctrine.)
Not every person of the Panweg folk was happy that the Cloetes of
Broederplein were still members of
the Moravian Church. I however never
even considered it necessary to make an issue of our church affiliation.
More Correspondence
with DRC Theologians
Instead of the manuscript of Honger
na Geregtigheid getting to Dr Beyers Naudé, it landed with the government.
The episode nevertheless had a positive result because government officials in
the years hereafter seemed to treat me with a considerable measure of respect. I
continued my correspondence with Dutch Reformed Church theologians in
South Africa, impressing on them the need for confession as a prelude to
reconciliation. The personal experience of confession by S.A. ‘Whites’ who were
involved with Moral Rearmament helped
me to forgive the racial group corporately. I concluded somewhat naively that
confession could be used as a tool to heal wounds inflicted by the apartheid
system.
After I had read in the
Dutch newspaper Trouw that Professor Nico Smith was visiting Holland, I
jumped at the opportunity to meet him. Some correspondence with him followed,
during which I stressed the need for confession once again. My effort backfired
when one of my letters to him was misconstrued in the Reforum conference
of ‘verligte’ (enlightened) DRC theologians. Either the way in which Nico
Smith presented my letter or the fact that he was the person who read it,
rubbed some participants up the wrong way. To so many conservative ‘Whites’ he
likened the red cloak in a bull fight - in the mould of Dr Beyers Naudé. From
one of the conference attendees I received an angry unsolicited reaction. It
was clear to me that the climate in that denomination was evidently not yet
ready for confession. That would change due to the advocacy of Professor Johan
Heyns with whom I had been corresponding fairly extensively by this time and
others like him. I experienced great satisfaction to read a little later that DRC
church leaders, members of the Schiphol
Airport delegation of 1979, had actually attempted to get the ban of Dr
Beyers Naudé lifted.
Applause for a Broederbonder
In a letter that I started writing on 19 November
1980 and concluded on 25 November 1980, I applauded Professor Heyns on the
efforts to get the ban of Dr Beyers Naudé lifted and that the Dutch Reformed
Church also called for the repeal of the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages
Act. In this correspondence I suggested a clear confession yet again, to be
accompanied by a concrete proposal of restitution.
I was of course very much
elated when the ban of Dr Beyers Naudé was finally lifted in 1984. Professor Heyns went on to play a major role in the transformation within
the Dutch Reformed Church regarding race relations. At the general synod
of 1986 the denomination made a significant turn around on the issue. Great of
course was my joy to hear of the confessions offered at the big church
conference at Rustenburg in 1990 and the prominent part that Professor Willie
Jonker played there, even though the government did not show appreciation
initially. The seed of confession
apparently still had to germinate in some hearts.
I experienced some
satisfaction at the result. However, the victories signalled were marred in the
years thereafter. Apartheid die-hards broke away to form their own
denomination, the Afrikaanse Protestantse
Kerk. Even more seriously, an unknown gunman, who possibly saw Johan Heyns
as a traitor of the Afrikaners, assassinated him on November 5, 1994. Professor
Johan Heyns would thus not witness the start of the process of uniting with the
sister reformed churches in 2003 that had been divided by the hurtful race
policies. Heyns left a great legacy nontheless. His theological contributions
had a large impact in changing the thinking of the Afrikaner government, ushering
in the end of apartheid and the beginning of the present democratic era.
Expressing Regret for Encouraging
Violence?
I had tried in vain to get various church organizations and forums to express
regret of the role of the church in encouraging violence. One of these
occasions was when I spoke at a church discussion in Driebergen, (Holland) in
the late 1970s when one of the big Reformed Churches was considering supporting
the armed struggle of the ANC. Aad Burger – the MRA man in Utrecht - organized
for me to be invited to speak at the church meeting.
When I read that Dr Beyers Naudé was appointed as the interim secretary
of the South African Council of Churches,
I thought that we now had the chance to get the churches moving on the issue of
confession. However, being ‘White’ and only a temporary incumbent of the post,
Dr Naudé seemed to be reluctant to stick his neck out too far. I had suggested
that the churches should also express regret for their part in condoning
violence as part of the struggle against apartheid.
I angered the Moral
Rearmament faithful by speaking in favour of boycotts as one of the few
tools available – as a last resort - to bring an end to apartheid rule.
11.
Employment Instability … and Blessing
The teenager Rens Schalkwijk returned
to the Netherlands with his parents from Jamaica in 1978 where his father had lectured
at the Moravian seminary. He joined the weekly prayer group at the Moravian Widow’s House every Friday afternoon
while he was still at school. There I got to know him. (This was the one link
to the denomination that I kept intact throughout our period of ministry in
Zeist.) Soon Rens’s mom led the weekly
prayer group after Lotte Reimeringer, the leader, had left for the US to help
take care of Corrie ten Boom, the renowned evangelist who had miraculously survived
the ordeal of a Nazi concentration camp. (Corrie had become quite frail there
in the US.)
With Rens I felt spiritually very
much on the same wave length. In 1982 he suggested that the two of us should
come together for early morning prayers just like our spiritual ancestors, the
Moravians, had been doing. This we put into practice, soon joined by Peter van
Veldhuyzen, a member of the Panweg fellowship. We prayer-walked in the
nearby forest before Peter left for his work from Monday to Friday for a few
months.
The 1982 prayer effort with Rens and Peter van Veldhuyzen culminated in
our starting the ‘Stichting Goed Nieuws Karavaan’ in Zeist that practised
various facets of evangelistic outreach.
Various Evangelistic Facets
When we volunteered
to take over the leadership of the ‘Kinderkaravaan’ work, I immediately
put forward my vision for a broadly based evangelistic outreach - also to the
youth, the unemployed and to the Huis van
Bewaring[32]
in Utrecht.
The
first meeting of the envisaged local evangelistic agency Goed Nieuws
Karavaan was also attended by the aged Sister Kooy, a member of the Moravian Church.[33]
She was already over eighty years old at that point in time and she had also
been a member of the prayer group at the Widow’s House on Zusterplein for
many years.
At
the inaugural Goed Nieuws Karavaan meeting I suggested a wide range of
evangelistic activities – in many of which I had been personally involved.
There was general excitement. People started to come and join us even from outside
the town of Zeist. It was surely unique that we soon had workers from three
doctrinally different Bible Schools of the area. Two were located in Zeist and
the other one in the nearby town of Doorn.
The
Goed Nieuws Karavaan
After that meeting Sister Kooy came to me, saying
wryly: ‘Listen, brother Cloete, I cannot
get involved in children’s ministry or one of these things that you have
mentioned. But I would like to start a weekly prayer meeting in my home for all
the activities’. Her home became the venue for the weekly prayer meeting of
a faithful few until 1996, when she went to be with the Lord. (From 1992
onwards the group was also praying for us in Cape Town.)
Within
a few months the ‘Stichting Goed Nieuws Karavaan’ was a reality with
workers from various local fellowships and others in the region. That people
from different church backgrounds could work together was completely new to the
bulk of them. The core group stayed together for many years. We left for our orientation
in England as missionary candidates in 1991. The group continued in a
low-key manner with evangelistic activities in Zeist up to this day. Quite a
few of our co-workers became involved in missionary work in different parts of
the world over the years. The spiritual backbone of
the team was the weekly prayer meeting at the home of the aged sister Kooy. The vehicle - an
old mobile shop - for which the Lord had miraculously supplied funds at the end
of 1982, was sold just before our entering full-time missionary work.
Children’s
clubs became the main focus of the Goed Nieuws Karavaan. We changed the
name on purpose to keep the link to the parent body Kinderkaravaan, but
simultaneously indicating that we wanted to engage in other activities than merely
ministering to children. Out of this ministry a children’s choir evolved, where
the children of the Panweg fellowship were the mainstay of the little
choir for many years. Toos Spilker, one of our first children’s workers, who
had come to a living faith in Jesus around 1980, led the choir all these years
- although she never enjoyed any training in music or choral work. The
children’s choir was still functioning many years after we had left Zeist,
consisting amongst others of children from the original participants. Toos
worked closely with Fenny Pos, who later became our contact person in Holland.
A Contribution to Church Unity
Our hope that we
could do this work full-time was completely dashed. God sent in finances
miraculously for a vehicle, but for the rest of the ministry needs there were
just sufficient funds to buy material for the children’s work. Much of the
expenses for the work were taken care of by the workers themselves.
Even though our initial hope was not
confirmed to become full-time workers for the Lord in this local evangelistic
endeavour, we did make a major contribution to church unity in the Netherlands
generally. For some Christians it was initially quite surprising that believers
from extreme church backgrounds could work together in harmony. Denominationally
we had co-workers so far apart as the ultra-conservative Christelijk
Gereformeerde Kerk, Pentecostals and a lone Roman Catholic children’s
worker whom I had the privilege to lead to the Lord.
Former workers emulated the
networking effort of which they had been a part when they left to other parts
of the country. Our local effort coincided with the national evangelistic
outreach of Campus Crusade called Er
is Hoop (There is Hope). Workers that had been ministering with us slotted
in with various local groups that were formed all over the country. Jeugd
met een Opdracht (Youth with a
Mission) and Youth for Christ had also created a lot of goodwill for
interdenominational evangelistic efforts.
Panweg as a Missional fellowship
Our small fellowship
at the Panweg in Zeist maintained a
great interest in missions in general.
From the word ‘go’ the fellowship supported various missionaries.
Liesbeth Walvaart and Bart Berkeij had been linked to the Red Sea Mission Team and the Panweg
group (later it was called Ichthus
Gemeente), before the two went to England where they studied at All Nations Bible College. The ‘Goed Nieuws Karavaan’ that
Rosemarie and I were leading, targeted the Moroccan and Turkish children and
youth of Zeist for loving missionary outreach.
Over the years quite a few of the ‘Goed
Nieuws Karavaan’ co-workers either became missionaries in other parts of
the world or influential church workers in their local congregations. A sad part of this endeavour was that we had
not yet fully understood the ramifications of spiritual warfare. Two of our
former co-workers had to return from the mission field prematurely. Mirjam Adriaanse
is now with the Lord and Liesbeth Walvaart was divinely healed after having been
a psychiatric patient for many years suffering from severe depression. In the
case of Liesbeth she was already preparing to go to Djibouti when our ministry
started getting off the ground. Mirjam
Adriaanse served the Lord among the inhabitants of the refuse dumps in the city
of Manila in the Philippines after her stint with us.
When we left for South Africa in
1992, we had however learnt the importance of having sufficient prayer
covering. We are convinced that the prayer support of many believers that enabled
us to survive in ministry here at the Cape after more than 25 years, a period
which included many attempts by the arch enemy to eliminate us, a few of them
physically.
Going
as Missionaries to the Middle East?
My interest at
fighting apartheid was still basically self-centered. In my heart there was
still the deep desire to return to my home country. During my quiet time in the
mid-1980s, God liberated me from this passion. I had been reading in the Word
how Joseph was taken out of his home country against his will; that was how I
felt. I discovered that Joseph never returned to Israel. This freed me of my
passionate yearning to return to South Africa. Hereafter I was ready to spend
the rest of my life abroad.
After I had stopped working as a
minister of the Moravian Church, a period of great uncertainty followed
for us as a couple. At this time a speaker from OM (Operation Mobilisation) came to one of our Ichthus church meetings.
I felt very much challenged to
venture into one of the Middle East countries as a missionary. A comparative
study of the number of missionaries in Islamic countries brought home to me the
dire need to share the Gospel there. It was clear that I could not go into one
of the closed countries as a Christian clergyman. I was thus highly motivated
to get an updated teaching qualification in Mathematics. At that stage
Rosemarie was not at all enthralled by my idea of going to a country like
Egypt. But she (initially patiently) allowed me to continue with my studies in
Mathematics in order to use that as an entrance into one of the countries that
were closed for Christian missionaries.
I had already turned 40 when I wrote
an examination in Mathematics to get qualified for teaching the subject in
Holland. On that very day our fifth child Tabitha was born. We wanted to get
involved with missions, but no door seemed to open. One of the major handicaps
was my South African passport. Our interest in joining OM got a blow when we
read in one of their leaflets sson thereafter: ‘Don’t wait till you are
forty and you have five children.’ That put paid to our intention of
joining OM.
Starting a
‘Boutique’
A
visit by Shadrach Maloka, an evangelist from the Dorothea Mission in
South Africa, spawned the sending of clothing to needy evangelists who were
linked to his ministry. Rosemarie was sensitive to the Holy Spirit. Financially
we were just making ends meet at this time, but we had a surplus of clothing because
we received donations of used clothing. This became the start of our clothing
distribution to missionaries, evangelists and other needy people. In our large
home, the former parsonage, we always sub-rented a room or helped someone with
accommodation, and yet we still had space to spare. A part of a big upstairs
room that was initially only used as a guest facility, was changed into a
little bring-and-share clothing ‘boutique’.
(Often some of the clothes that
had been ‘bought’ in this way were back in the ‘boutique’ after a few weeks,
ready for re-sale or to be sent to some foreign country.) For some Dutch
believers who never before considered wearing used clothing, this was a new
experience in good stewardship.
Missionaries from overseas could also come and
make their pick there. Salou and
Annelies, a befriended YWAM missionary couple, even filled a vehicle that they
had received as a gift. The vehicle was shipped to Cameroun with clothes and
all.
12. Fighting Communism and Islam
The South African Apartheid era government
denigrated any notion which vaguely approached Socialism. Very glibly Communism
and Socialism were equated and misunderstood.
Since 1969 I had been praying for
persecuted Christians in countries ruled by Communists. Battling the ideology
of Communism was however never high on my personal agenda. Nevertheless, I
harvested a pulpit ban while I was still a student at the Moravian Seminary
after I had referred to the communalism of the Jerusalem Christians of Acts 2.
A policeman among the congregants threatened Reverend John Swart, the local
pastor. He interpreted my message as promotion of and furthering the goals of
Communism. Reverend Swart was requested not to ask me to preach there again
otherwise the brother would have been required to arrest me.
Attempting
to be moderate…
My intention to
be moderate in the best sense of the word and my attempts to practice fair play
at all times, often brought me into trouble with opposing parties. I harvested enemies
by criticising the unjust economic colonial structures, noting that we in the
affluent West were exploiting the poor of the third world. To many Christians
this was socialist language that befitted the left of the political spectrum.
How could I then be against Communism? To some folk this was puzzling. Some
evangelicals derogatorily regarded me as an ecumenical. The latter Christian
grouping was usually not regarded favourably by evangelicals. To some of them
the word ecumenical wa akin to a swear word.
I could not care less if people would label me as ‘sitting
on the fence’. I was not ashamed of my stance, deriving my views from the Bible
and my faith. This had been my ultimate source of inspiration. With this stance
I felt comfortable, knowing that in this matter I was in the league of 18th
century Moravians – sometimes attacked from opposite sides.
Rotbuch Kirche
After right-wing
German church politicians had been funded to visit South Africa - with the
obvious intention of the apartheid government to further their own cause - my
former student colleagues who were now vikare
(assistant pastors) in Southern Germany, approached me. They wanted me to reply
to the articles on Southern Africa in a book called ‘Rotbuch Kirche’.
This book accused the World Council of
Churches (WCC) of a Communist slant, slamming especially their support of
the armed struggle. This occurred via the groups that opposed the racist rule
in Southern African countries in their Programme
to Combat Racism (PCR). I responded to the request with an article that was
then distributed among young clergymen in Southern Germany.
A ‘Crusade’ with a Difference
The next major
chapter of our involvement with the battle against the Communist ‘Wall’ got off
the ground in Holland at this time. Especially because of the protection they were
offering when the Jews were persecuted by the Nazi’s, the Dutch still take
great pride in general that they support the persecuted Christians.
A great pioneer of the battle
against Communism was Anne van der Bijl. The formative years of World War II
made Van der Bijl sensitive to the needs of the persecuted Christian believers.
Worldwide he became known as Brother Andrew and as the leader of Open Doors.
The discovery that Bibles were
almost impossible to get into those countries made Brother Andrew the pioneer
of a ‘crusade’ with a difference, namely to smuggle Bibles into the Communist
countries. Through ‘Kruistochten’,[34]
as Open Doors was initially known in
Holland, we prayed regularly in our home for persecuted Christians in different
countries. At family meal times we would pray for some persecuted Communist
Christians by name. It was always a thrill to remove the one or other face from
a small box with cards that one could purchase from Open Doors. Each card contained the name and photograph of some
persecuted Christian for whom we had prayed. The removal of a card from the
little box indicated that the believer had been released from prison. We would praise
God that He had answered the prayers for these people.
Rosemarie and I knew that we were
called to overseas’ missionary work ever since our first Wycliffe Bible
Translators date way back in 1970. The seven years of prayer for the Soviet
Union from 1984 were integrated in our family prayers while we were praying for
God to lead us into overseas’ missions. In the children’s clubs of the ‘Goed
Nieuws Karavaan the children were taught a song about the persecution of
Christians in Russia and China. This was an integral part of the
the seven years of prayer for the Soviet Union.
At this time the Full Gospel fellowship of Zeist in the
cinema Figi had a close link to Open Doors. Brother and Sister Heijnk,
who started the church as one of the very first charismatic fellowships in the
Netherlands, had linked up with Anne van der Bijl (Brother Andrew) and his
organization from the beginning of his Bible smuggling to the Communist world.
When Open Doors changed their focus
to the Islamic world, the church remained very much in full support, with a few
of the members joining the missionary ranks in some role. This is the fellowship
that we started to attend in 1988, becoming members in 1989.
Another Bash at
the Iron Curtain
In 1987 we undertook
our first ‘faith holiday’ as a family. Financially we could actually not afford
to go on holiday, but we dared to venture out in faith with the prayer that the
Lord would use the period of vacation in the German village of Tieringen. (The
German government heavily subsidized this facility to enable big families that
struggled financially, to go on holiday.)
Tieringen would become the beginning
of the next chapter of our struggle against the atheist Communist regimes.
There we met Erwin Klein and his family, who had just come out of Romania
legally because of his German ancestry. Through them we not only got valuable
information, but we also received addresses from Christians in the socialist
home country of Sina Klein, Erwin’s wife.
After September 1987 we started sending
clothing to Romania. The Holy Spirit was evidently orchestrating things. From
the Dutch town of Zeist almost a mini Romania disease broke out in support of
the suffering Christians. We could gradually understand why God wanted us to
stay in Zeist, our ‘Jerusalem’. The town is situated more or less in the middle
of the Netherlands. Parcels with clothing and articles that were scarce in Romania,
were sent to different addresses supplied to us by Sina Klein. Our ‘clothing
depot’ alias ‘boutique’ came in handy with the Goed Nieuws Karavaan folk funding the
postage. The main source of income for this project was people ‘buying’ clothes.
Clandestine visits to Romania
followed hereafter from different parts of Holland. I was blessed and
privileged to join a ‘touring bus’ in 1989. Various organizations that brought
aid to the Communist world intensified their aid to Romania, although this
apparently had not been formally decided. This was obviously part of the divine
Master Plan to break down the Communist stronghold. Of course, this made the
Ceaucescu regime quite nervous because their nationals were officially not
supposed to have contact with foreigners.
The rest is fairly well known
history. When Michail Gorbachow took over as the leader in the Kremlin, God had
evidently put the right man in place for that season. That the old guard of the
Sovjets had died one after the other before his ascent to power was obviously
providential. It was fitting that the avalanche towards the removal of the
Berlin wall in November 1989 and the final demise of Communism all started with
Anne van der Bijl of Open Doors when he offered one million Bibles to
the Russian Orthodox Church at the celebration
of her 1000th anniversary.
The battle was however far from over
with the Russian Orthodox Church’s
acceptance of the gift of Bibles to which Gorbachov, a modern-day Cyrus, surprisingly
agreed. The praying Christians around the world knew of course that this had
been painstakingly prepared, bathed in prayer. The groaning of the believers
behind the iron curtain has been compared by the agonizing cries of the
Israelites in the Egypt of old when God brought Moses on the scene. This was the beginning of the defeat of atheist Communism.
13. Movement on the Mission Front
As a family we kept praying for a
‘door’ to open to some African country, using the book Operation World
of Patrick Johnstone. But nothing happened for many years. A North African
country – my first preference - came out of contention when I sensed that Rosemarie
was not so keen at this option. My South African passport remained nevertheless
a major hindrance. This was still a problem when we went to the annual national
Evangelical Alliance event in Amsterdam
in 1988. There the various mission agencies advertised their vacancies. Rosemarie and I had
been attending the annual mission day of the regularly, first in Amsterdam and
from 1989 in the little town of Barneveld. Year after year we went there hoping
that the door to foreign missions would open up. When we went to Amsterdam in
1988 we had actually more or less given up the hope to do missionary work
elsewhere. Our eldest son Danny was about to enter secondary school and
there were four more children to follow. When Tabitha, our youngest, would be
finished with her education I would be almost at pension age. On top of it, it
seemed as if hardly any mission agency would be prepared to accept a family
with five children.
The “Door” suddenly opened
In Amsterdam
I nevertheless took along a leaflet from Africa Inland Mission (AIM)
that struck me. The mission agency was looking for teachers at their boarding
school for the children of missionaries in Nairobi, Kenya. The “door” suddenly
opened for the first time. When we spoke to the representatives of AIM, they
encouraged us, even seeing other possibilities iin view of my training and
background. The only problem was my South African passport. But seeing that I
had been in Holland so long, the AIM leader suggested that I should apply for a
Dutch passport (Possession of dual nationality was still very uncommon at that
time.)
This was however easier said than
done. To this end I was required to return my passport
to the South African Embassy. The problem that I would then have to
apply for a visa to visit my parents and my home country did not even enter my
mind at that stage. My main problem was the feeling of having to cut off my own
roots. It had been traumatic already that not only our home and school in
District Six had been razed to the ground. My high school in Vasco suffered the
same fate because of the Group Areas Act
and our home in Tiervlei/Ravensmead had to be vacated under the guise of apartheid-related
slum clearance and ultimately bulldozed as well. Would I now also have to lose
citizenship of the country that I was loving so dearly?
I nevertheless buried my pride and
inner turmoil, sensing that a step of obedience was required.
We had been praying all the years for the possibility to return to Africa for
missionary work. How could I cop out now?
God confirming the Move
A few months later
God confirmed the move in a sovereign way. It all started when our black and white
TV set that we had bought in Berlin in 1975, packed up just prior to the
Olympic Games of 1988. When the old apparatus gave the ghost, we decided not to
replace it. However, we thought that the Olympic Games would be something that
could also have some educational value for our children. Our quest after a
second hand model from the newspaper resulted in us agreeing to take a TV set
on loan via a befriended couple. Their aged mother was hardly using her set in
the old age home. We agreed that we would keep the TV set only for the duration
of the Olympic Games.
Dutch Citizenship?
When a
letter arrived from The Hague regarding my application for Dutch citizenship, an
administration fee of 400 guilders was mentioned. This was occurring at a time
- the only occasion during our 14 years in Holland - when our banking account
was in the red, although we had been scraping the barrel financially for the
bulk of our time there.
Rosemarie and I ‘took’ the letter to
the Lord in prayer. I still had turmoil in my heart, really struggling with the
prospect of possibly having to lose my South African citizenship in the course
of this procedure.
God intervened in a clear way via a
befriended family that was struggling themselves financially. From them we had
borrowed the TV set. When our brother came to collect it, he announced that he
and his wife wanted to give us 800 guilders so that we could buy a new set. I
was overawed that God sent in double the amount we needed for my Dutch
citizenship application! The
brother and his wife could not know that we had been praying for confirmation.
He was of course very much surprised when I showed him the letter. He agreed
that we could use the money for that purpose and other more urgent needs
instead of buying a TV set.[35] I was reassured at
the same time that God was in the move when I was required to return my passport to the S.A. Embassy. However,
I did this still rather reticently. Our application for Dutch
citizenship could start. I however had to reckon with a two-year waiting
period.
A national Prayer Awakening erupts
I
was not aware that significant things in the spiritual realm had already
started in South Africa not long after we left the Cape in June 1981. Thus
vastly different groups, like those in the Mother City which gathered on
a weekly basis, as well as Black women in the Soutpansberg area interceded
fervently that the country might be spared massive bloodshed. Many longed for
an end to the misery caused by apartheid, praying that it might cease soon.
The
Sendingsgestig Museum in Cape Town became the venue for Concerts of Prayer.
That event reverberated throughout the country, ushering in the prayer
movement. In
1983 a prayer awakening started in a few congregations all around South Africa.
One of these was a small group of intercessors led by Gerda Leithgöb in
Pretoria that helped set them on a path previously unexplored in this country.
In 1987 the Lord led the group in Pretoria to do more
intense research into spiritual matters. In that same year, a similar
initiative started spontaneously all over the world. The Lord also called
pastors in South Africa to start writing on prayer. Books appeared concerning
this issue.
Gerda
Leithgöb requested prayer warriors from other countries at a conference in
Singapore in 1988 to pray for South Africa, which had been in constant crisis
since 1985.
Various Prayer Initiatives
In January 1988 Rens
Schalkwijk, who had been coming in and going out of our home quite often - so
much so that he was a natural choice to become the godfather of our youngest
daughter Tabitha in 1986 - came along with the suggestion that we should resume
our times of prayer, but perhaps in a different way.
We started a Sunday evening prayer
meeting at our home. Rens Schalkwijk brought along another couple, Ria and her
fiancé Lukas Hartong, who were students at the local Pentecostal Bible School (Ria had been one of our children’s club
workers). Out of these prayer times Rens was ‘delegated’ to attend a meeting
with David Bryant, an international speaker who had come to Holland to invite
Dutch Christians to start Concerts of
Prayer.
In August 1988 - through the active
urge of Rens Schalkwijk and his contacts with Pieter Bos, the prayer movement
in the Netherlands got underway. Rens and I were soon leading the first unit of
the ‘Regiogebed’ of the country - that of Driebergen-Zeist as a Concert of Prayer.
By
this time we had proved a point with the work of the Goed Nieuws Karavaan.
This local evangelistic ministry was going well with about 30 workers from
different denominations, involved in a wide range of evangelistic ministries.
We had demonstrated to Dutch Christians that it was possible for people from
different church backgrounds to work together locally without doctrinal tussles
- if we would only concentrate on the person of Jesus.
A Great Shock
We had quite a close
friendship to Bart Berkheij, who was studying at the All Nations Bible College in London even before he got married to
Ruth, a student colleague. A special bond developed between his wife, a
daughter of missionaries, and Rosemarie. The two of them were pregnant almost
at the same time when we had our three youngest children. We empathized with
the Berkheij family as they struggled for many years to go through all sorts of
preparations until they could finally go to Mali as missionaries of the Red Sea Mission team.
Great was the shock therefore when
we heard that Ruth had been killed in a car accident. The family had been in
Mali only for a very short time!
Joining
another Fellowship?
I ran into problems
with a certain couple of our Panweg fellowship because Roman Catholic nuns participated in the Regiogebed.
These believers had obviously been so influenced by anti-Catholic
indoctrination that they could not believe that born-again people - especially
nuns - could be in the ‘church of the Pope’. The unity of the body of our Lord
was an issue around which we felt that we could not compromise. Other
simultaneous tensions in the fellowship brought matters to a head. To all
intents and purposes a split followed.
This internal dispute in our
Panweg fellowship coincided
with a financial and transport crisis within our family. Our old VW minibus
needed expensive repairs at a time when we had a negative banking account for
the first time. We had been scraping the barrel for many years, but we somehow
never landed in the red. Now this had happened.
We decided to walk on Sunday
mornings to the nearby Figi congregation – the Full Gospel fellowship – until such time when we would be ‘mobile’
again. The problem of transport was really not a crucial issue because all and
sundry in Holland use the bicycle regularly. (As a family we were often on the
road on a Sunday afternoon in that way, with our two youngest children
respectively transported by Rosemarie and me.)
We were slandered and unfairly criticized
by folk from the Panweg fellowship,
but we nevertheless hoped that matters could be resolved and that
reconciliation could be achieved. It never entered our heads to fight back.
Yet, we yearned to return to the fellowship from which we had so many happy
memories over the previous seven years.
But it was not to be. A letter from
Dick van Stelten, a friend and Dutch missionary who served in South Africa,
comforted and helped us. He did not know anything about the situation in Zeist.
We needed spiritual breathing space! The reconciliation with the Panweg folk
did not come about until much later, when the children were already settled in
the new church environment of ‘Figi’ that we joined formally in 1989. It
took some time for me personally to warm up in the new church, but once we
joined a home cell, things improved considerably.
A permanent Teaching Post?
By
November 1988 I had a modern Dutch secondary teaching certificate for
Mathematics in my possession. In fact, I
was on the verge of getting a higher teaching qualification in that subject.
The prospect of having a home of our own in the picturesque little town of
Huizen where I got a teaching post - which
could become permanent - was so attractive.
After so many temporary teaching
posts in Holland, I really wanted to settle down. Through all this tension my
yearning to get involved in foreign missionary work got very much of a back
seat. My frustration at the lack of getting a permanent post as a teacher was
abused by the arch enemy to lure me away from our calling in the service of the
Lord. Like the prophet Jonah of old, God had to intervene in a very clear
way.
A major disappointment became the
divine moulding instrument to bring me back on track in terms of my missionary
calling. The teacher in Huizen, whom I had substituted, decided to return to
the secondary school when my three month probation period was about to run out.
The Lord used this circumstance and a few others in a month of calamities, to
throw us back onto our ‘first love’ – to be in the Master’s service in a
full-time missionary capacity.
More Involvement with the Communist World
At the concerts of
prayer - the ‘Regiogebed’ - with participants from different church
backgrounds, we prayed for local issues, for missionaries who left from our
area but also for certain countries. In 1989 we prayed especially for Communist
countries, notably for the German Democratic Republic, Hungary and Romania. We
were really encouraged by the news that came through from East Germany. Praying
Christians in Leipzig and Dresden seemed to be at the forefront of the surge
towards real democracy.
When I was invited to give pastoral
assistance to other participants on a ‘touring bus’, scheduled to go to Romania
in November 1989, Nikolai Ceausescu and his clan were still firmly in command.
Because I was unemployed at the time of the offer, I initially declined the
invitation on ethical grounds. I had just acquired a more advanced Dutch
Mathematics teaching diploma, hoping that this would at last give me a
permanent position after more than 8 years of uncertainty with regard to
employment.
I felt that it was my first duty to
feed my family and not to do pastoral duties on a touring bus to Communist
countries. It was an open secret of course that this was not normal tourism.
The other reason for declining the invitation was that I possessed a South
African passport. After a few bad check point experiences in East Berlin on
this score, I did not want to cause inconvenience for the rest of the group.
When Jan van der Bor, the Dutch
leader of the “Underground Church” - as Richard Wurmbrand called his
organization - approached me a second time, my last application for a teaching
post had been very discouraging. My hope
of getting an appointment as a Maths teacher in Holland was all but dashed.
Apparently I was now ‘over-qualified’ for the bulk of the few teaching posts in
Maths that were available.
On the other hand, doors started to
open up towards the mission field.
14. Africa beckons
October 1989 was one of the very
special months in our lives. God works in mysterious ways his wonders to
perform. Unwittingly I was preparing my return to Africa, to my dear Heimat
(home land) at that. On 4 October 1989 I
wrote a letter to President De Klerk, the new incumbent, in
which I confessed my activism and arrogance after I had sensed an inward divine
conviction because of that.
A special Prayer Event
The ‘regiogebed’
that we started in our area in August 1988, congregated every first Thursday of
the month for a Concert of Prayer. As
a rule we congregated in a different church building every time, using venues
of various denominations. At our meeting of 4 October 1989 I mentioned in
passing to someone that I had posted a letter to President De Klerk that day.
Spontaneously this person, a teacher from the nearby town of Doorn who was no
regular at our prayer meetings, suggested that we devote more time that evening
to pray for South Africa. Nobody objected. That had a supernatural touch. The
whole prayer meeting was devoted to praying for one country, for South Africa.
That was the only occasion when we did it in that way.
Nobody present at the prayer meeting
was aware of it that President De Klerk would meet Archbishop Tutu and Dr Allan
Boesak the next week. That strategic meeting became in a sense a watershed in
the politics of the country, the prelude to the release of Nelson Mandela and
the end of apartheid. Also in other countries - especially in South Africa
itself - people had been praying for a change of the suicidal direction of the
political system.
The prayer meeting in Zeist was
special to me in another sense. This was one of the very first opportunities in
evangelical circles where I experienced clear support for my opposition to my
government at home. Many Dutch people perceived evangelical believers to be
supportive of apartheid. In this spiritual environment South Africa was regarded
as a bastion against Communist expansion, full stop. The notionwas somehow
still doing the rounds in the Netherlands that as an evangelical one had to
support apartheid. Leftist ecumenicals on the other hand would often defend
Communism as a brand of Socialism. That was regarded as acceptable without serious
reservations from the left side of Dutch Christianity. I was opposing both
positions. I was however not always successful in communicating my sentiments
‘properly’.
Two Invitations to travel
We were challenged in
yet another way when Marry Schotte of WEC
(Worldwide Evangelisation for Christ) International shared at the annual Evangelical Missionary Alliance event in
Barneveld in 1989 about a mission school in Vavoua, Cote I’voire. There they
needed teachers. Their need seemed furthermore geared to what I could offer. In
the WEC school for the children of missionaries they had departments for Dutch
and German children. The common language of the school was English. I could
teach Mathematics - for which they indeed had a vacancy - in all three
languages. When Marry Schotte brought along a video of the school when she
visited us in Zeist, she succeeded in getting our children excited. Before this
they found the prospect of going to ‘Africa’ quite scary.
I hardly
had opportunity to digest this challenge when along came our friend Wil
Heemsbergen with a repeated invitation. They wanted me to join a touring bus
trip to Romania, to assist on the pastoral side of the touring bus to the
Communist stronghold with all expenses paid.
Very soon thereafter our friend Bart Berkheij, who lost his
wife in a car accident in 1988, phoned with the request whether I could join
him on a trip to Mali at the end of January 1990. All
expenses would be paid for him and a friend, to go and wind up things where he
had served with his family. From there he had suddenly left the previous year after
the car accident in which his wife was killed. I declined Bart’s invitation to
join him initially because I was still unemployed. It was very attractive to
get a feeling of West Africa in the light of our own preparations to go to Cote
d’Ivoire. However, I found it ethically inappropriate to plan this while I was
still hoping to get a teaching post. Everything looked cut and dried when I
heard that he had found someone else to join him on his trip to Mali.
A dreaded brown Envelope
Then it happened! In
the post there was the dreaded brown envelope from the Dutch Department of Justice. I thought:
‘Surely this is the traffic fine.’ (I had been photogrpahed when driving
through a red traffic light in Germany a few weeks prior to this.) Instead
however, it was a letter on behalf of Queen Beatrix to inform me that Dutch
citizenship had been granted to me! Out of the blue I thus heard that my
application for Dutch citizenship was successful. (I was waiting for the test of language
proficiency that I had expected as the next step of the process.) Now I could
get my Dutch passport, so much earlier than what everybody had anticipated! In
fact, within a few days I had a passport in my possession, ready to be off to
Hungary and Romania! (I had previously declined an invitation for a second time
to do pastoral duties on a ‘tourist’ bus because of my fear that a South
African passport might cause difficulties for the other participants.)
Hungary
and Romania
The bus was almost
empty in terms of passengers, but loaded with Bibles, Christian literature and
material goods for the persecuted Christians behind the ‘iron curtain’. The
bulk of the load was left in Hungary. The experiences in Hungary and Romania
were sobering, emotionally not easy to handle at all. Hungary had already
started opening up to the West. The hospitality of the Reformed Christians, our
hosts, was really heart-warming.
We delivered the bulk of the material
aid to the persecuted Christians there. Other Christians would take the
literature in small quantities to the various countries that were still in the
grip of oppressive Communism.
Rumania was a completely different
cup of tea compared to East Germany or Hungary. We had hardly passed the Austrian
border into Hungary when one of our passengers, who originated from Hungary
before her marriage to a Dutchman, picked up the news on the radio. A bus with
tourists from the West was announced. The border officials deemed it important
to relay this snippet of information to the national radio station. We were ‘in
the news’! What a special item! The intention was of course to label us. It was
forbidden for Romanians to have contact with foreigners.
What a joy our presence
brought to those Romanian believers whom we visited! Even though none of us
could speak a language known to them and not a single one of them could speak a
West European language, we experienced a special kind of fellowship. The
gesture that Christians in the West have not forgotten them, made their day!
The trip ended very traumatic. The
Romanian Securitate, their secret police, had evidently done their
homework very well. They knew exactly which people from our group were involved
with the bulk of the clandestine activities. They extracted information via a
search that included the underclothing of one of our participants and unearthing
a letter that someone was requested to post in the West. All this brought our
trip to Romania to a very sad end.
While we were there, something
significant had happened elsewhere. We missed the television viewing of the
breaking down of the Berlin wall on November 9! In Romania it was of course not
shown on the State TV. (There the population was fed with the ‘staple diet’ -
the diverse activities of the Ceaucescu clan at almost any time of the day. We
witnessed this in our hotel rooms.)
Rebellion
in Romania
It was something of a
consolation when we heard soon thereafter that there was rebellion in Romania.
At this time I was working part-time at the East
Europe Mission for a few days per week. (It had become clear that a
position as teacher in Mathematics in Holland was remote. But the process to
become missionaries in Africa had of course also started.) Now and then I was
taking Bibles and other material aid on behalf of the East Europe Mission to Switzerland. The loads were scheduled for
the Communist countries. Other people would take the valuable goods further.
The fighting in Timisoara near to
the Hungarian border soon got to a critical stage. Tineke Zwaan, one of our Goed
Nieuws Karavaan co-workers, phoned us with a suggestion. She wanted to come
over with her husband Gideon so that we could have a special session of prayer
for Romania. We had close contact with Tineke for many years, when she was
still single and unemployed. She had been one of the founder workers of our
evangelistic team of the Goed Nieuws Karavaan.
I assume that we were one of many
groups around the world that were raised up at that point in time to pray for
the Communist stronghold to crumble. Within a matter of days, the days of the
dictator Ceaucescu were counted.
In the next few months the almost
complete demise of Communism took place, with Cuba and North Korea remaining as
significant bastions of the atheistic ideology.
Another Invitation to Mali
I had hardly returned
from Romania, when Bart Berkheij approached me again to accompany him to West
Africa, mentioning that the friend who would have joined him, had pulled out.
This time I was happy to accept the invitation to join him to go to Mali on
condition that he would join me to Cote I’voire (Ivory Coast). Last not least,
I now had a Dutch passport. In the Ivory Coast I wanted to explore the
situation at the mission school where I hoped to go and teach.
The experience during this trip was
so encouraging that I was highly motivated to return to the Ivory Coast as a
missionary with my family.
Experiences in West
Africa
The Mali part of the trip was very interesting, my one and only visit to
West Africa to date. In fact, that was the first time that I visited another
African country. A highlight of that trip was that I could listen to the BBC radio
news report that President de Klerk announced at the opening of Parliament:
Nelson Mandela would be released soon and the ANC was unbanned!
Bart and I were due to fly
from Abidjan, the capital city of Côte d’Ivoire on 16 February, 1990. The last
day in the West African metropolis was exceptional. I had already thoroughly enjoyed
the bus trip from Vavoua, during which I had a meaningful ‘conversation’ with a
student who had studied German. I practiced my recently acquired French,
translating a tract about the lost sheep of Luke 15 into German, for him to check.
The openness for the Gospel in the West African metropolis impressed me deeply.
Bart and I spent the
morning doing some sightseeing and shopping – buying small artefacts to take
along for the families at home in Holland! Nostalgia overtook me as I looked
over the Islamic city! When I saw a few mosques, it so much resembled the old
District Six, the slum-like area of my childhood. I had thought that South
Africa was out of my mind in terms of a return there! But in a fleeting moment
I was overwhelmed by nostalgia. It was strange that my trip was supposed to be
an orientation for us as missionaries to West Africa. But I was now also
ambivalently longing to return to my home country. Nelson Mandela had just been
released. I was quite sad that I could not witness the event via a TV set as we
had been travelling through rural Africa! Was the way opening up for me to
return to my home country after all? At that moment however, I was firmly
set on returning to Côte d’Ivoire to teach in the WEC mission school in Vavoua.
A Nudge to tackle the daunting Wall
of Islam
With the ‘iron curtain’
of Communism and the edifice of apartheid all but shattered by February 1990, supernatural intervention occurred in Abidjan,
nudging me to tackle the daunting wall of Islam. Quite a deep impression
followed our ‘visit to a mosque’, in which we landed by accident. It was Friday
and all the shops were closing for the lunch time. We had no opportunity to
continue our shopping spree. We simply took a seat next to the road, waiting
for the shops to reopen. Suddenly prayer mats were rolled out all around us.
Bart was sitting obliquely behind me. Somehow I had the impression that he was
also doing the obligatory raka’ts, the Islamic cycles of body movements
accompanying the prayers. Thus I simply joined in, imitating the people in
front of me. Suddenly I heard an angry stifled shout-whisper: ‘Ashley, wat
doe je daar!’ (Ashley, what are you doing!) What a bashing he gave me
hereafter for going through the Islamic motions.
As I looked at the people in front of me, I experienced some
sort of thrill. It was as if the Lord was reassuring me that these bodily
movements were no more than meaningless tradition; that some day the Islamic
‘Wall’ would also crash like the communist ‘iron curtain’ had done. Bart
continued harshly: ‘and you want to
become a missionary?’ Strangely enough, I didn’t feel any remorse... In
fact, I was excited!
The experience of that day helped me to persevere over the
next decades of low-key missionary work among Muslims, although it seemed as if
we were wasting our time. The
insight I gained from this experience was quite special. I recognised that
having your hands in the air while we sing hymns and choruses – or performing other
ritual gestures - could be just as empty! Having come from the Moravian Church with its rich tradition
of ritual and music, the message of Isaiah hit home to me that outward feasts
and celebrations - without a genuine concern also for the poor and the needy -
could actually be disgusting in God’s eyes (Isaiah 58).
My
attitude to mission work in Black Africa also changed completely there in Côte
d’Ivoire. This is what mattered most to us because this is where we eventually
wanted to be as a family. The experience during this trip was so encouraging
that I was highly motivated to return to West Africa.
Later that year Iraq’s leader Saddam Hussain attacked
Kuweit, the single event that ushered in ten years of prayer for the Muslim
world. The direct result of Iraq’s move - and their failure to withdraw from
Kuweit - was the Gulf War of 1991.
Future Mission
Work linked to Spiritual Warfare,
That future mission work in Africa would
be linked to spiritual warfare, was foreshadowed when I heard on my return to
Holland that our daughter Magdalena had a close call with meningitis during my
three-week absence. During that time I
had no contact with the family.
Our
Magdalena had been terribly ill. Because she had contact with another child
that had contracted meningitis, Rosemarie went through excruciating trauma.
What my wife shared on my return would become a pattern – some member of the
family would be attacked health-wise during my absence from home. We learned to
pray for special protection for them at these times.
We
deemed it fit to speak to the leaders of the local Full Gospel Church about our missional plans, although we had been
church members for less than a year. The dynamic ‘Mama’ Heijnk, the leader, was
quite contented when she heard that we intended to use teaching, the vocation
in which I had been trained. She stated clearly that as a church fellowship
they were financially committed to Brother Andrew's ‘Kruistochten’ (Open
Doors), although she felt that more missionaries should go to the Muslim
world.
At
the discussion with the new church leadership team a few months later - the old
Heijnks had taken a back seat – the leaders were quite surprised that we didn’t
mention financial support. Not very long hereafter, the elders progressed even
further along a new road: they committed themselves to substantial regular
monthly support for the Cloete family. (That promise became the basis of what
we would trust the Lord for rental payments in Cape Town in 1992).
The Yoke of ritual Bondage
As the years went on, we discerned that many Muslims were wrestling
under the yoke of ritual bondage. The question became even more pressing: How
will all those millions of people ever get rid of the thick veil over their
eyes? As my wife and I read 2 Corinthians 3 once again, we were reminded that
Martin Luther only got into the freedom of Christ when he discovered that he
needed a Saviour. This only occurred when he developed a deep sense of urgency
about his own sin. We also realised anew that this is something that only God
can accomplish in a sovereign way through his Holy Spirit. God doesn’t need us,
but we can be instruments in His hands to change the world, especially through
prayer.
Preparation for
missionary Training
With Campus Crusade[36]
I had started to do some voluntary work in Holland with Bram Krol, one of their
fulltime workers. Also from that side we
were challenged to work full-time for them. We were quite serious about this
idea, starting to look at a house in Zeist that we hoped to purchase. Just
before my father-in-law passed away in February 1989, he indicated that he and
his wife wanted to help us to buy a house.
As
a next major step in our planning and praying within the family, we got ready
for our WEC candidates’ training course. But before that could start, we needed
a Dutch teacher to join us. At our extended weekly family devotions even the
little ones now started to pray fervently for a volunteer teacher to accompany
us to England.
The Lord used the trip to West
Africa in yet another way. While I was there, our long-standing friend Geertje
Rehorst visited Rosemarie one evening. When Geertje heard from Rosemarie that
we were praying for a teacher, she asked all sorts of questions.
Doors open up
I had returned to
Holland quite excited, raving about the apparent openness towards the Gospel in
West Africa. The discussions at the school in Vavoua were promising, although I
intended that to be merely a prelude for other missionary work after a few
years. But I still had to get fluent in French, the lingua franca of
West Africa. Rosemarie had not even started learning this language.
On my return from West Africa
there were quite a few letters awaiting me, two of which were challenges to new
areas of ministry. We decided to move further along the road
towards the teaching post at the WEC (Worldwide
Evangelisation for Christ) school for missionary kids in Ivory Coast,
unless the Lord would close that door. The possibility of working as a
Mathematics teacher appeared to be specially fitted to what I could offer. After all, there were not that many people
around who would be available and willing to teach Mathematics in the three languages
English, German and Dutch at the school in Vavoua.
Come over and help us!
Most of all I was surprised that Rosemarie appeared to be eagerly
awaiting my response to a letter from South Africa. Among other letters there
was a hand-written one from Pietie Orange, a friend from our young days in
Tiervlei (Ravensmead).
There was not much in
Pietie’s letter in terms of contents, but very clearly there was the clarion
call: COME OVER AND HELP US. I was quite
perplexed and somewhat confused. The experiences in West Africa especially were
still fresh in my mind. For years the doors to mission services seemed to
remain closed and now there appeared to be many ‘doors’ opening. Which was the
right one?
I was surprised to sense Rosemarie’s
excitement about the possibility to go to South Africa. She knew of my fervent desire to return to my
home country. In the early years of our marriage it caused a lot of strain when
she sensed that I perceived it as a sacrifice to live in Europe. Through my
‘Joseph experience’ God had thoroughly dealt with my craving after a return to
South Africa. I was fully prepared to serve God anywhere in the world and quite
willing never to return to South Africa on a permanent basis - if that was the
confirmed divine guidance. Now Rosemarie seemed to be ready to join me!
A
Teacher for our Children?
In order to join WEC,
we needed a teacher for our children during the time of our candidates’
orientation. We really had very little faith. Where on earth could one get a
teacher who not only had to pay the fare to go to either Germany or Holland,
pay for accommodation, teach learners in four different grades and not receive
any salary?
Our children were now definitely on
board. It was so moving to hear them praying for a teacher. How earnestly the
little ones would pray for someone to go with us to teach them during the
candidates’ orientation of Rosemarie and me. Their faith put us as parents to
shame.
The Lord used my trip to West Africa
to sort out this problem. While I was in Mali our longstanding friend Geertje
Rehorst visited Rosemarie one evening. When Geertje
heard that we were praying for a teacher, she asked Rosemarie all sorts of
questions. Because Geertje had stopped teaching not long prior to this on what
sounded to us like medical grounds, we never even considered her as a possible
candidate to help us out.
When Geertje’s son Peter visited us
with his wife Annelies just after my return from West Africa, we told them of
our need of a teacher to accompany us to England. Promptly he asked: ‘Have
you thought of my mother?’ At Barthimeus, the local School for the Blind, Geertje had been teaching children of different
age groups. When we invited Geertje over one evening to put the question to her
very hesitantly, she confirmed that she knew all along that the Lord wanted her
to go to England with us for the WEC missionary orientation course. She was
only waiting on us to approach her. That she was available enabled another
Dutch couple with children in the same age range as our children to attend the
course.
Children’s Fun at School
Our children had such
a time of fun at school during those four months at Bulstrode! The Lord used
the stint at the international WEC Headquarters near to London to bring Geertje
back into the missionary framework. She subsequently became a consultant for
missionaries in Spain on behalf of ECM, the successor of her old mission agency,
the Europeese Zendingsgenootschap (EZG) till the end of 2003.
This happened long before member care became common in missions.
When we worked in Zeist among
Moroccan and Turkish children, we were not aware that the Lord had started to
prepare us for a future ministry among the Muslims of Cape Town. Even when we
invited Herman Takken, who was involved with this work in Holland full-time -
to come and give us some teaching on Islam - I was not remotely thinking of
using it one day in the city where I was born and bred. Operating as a
missionary in a Muslim country was nevertheless one of the options I kept in
mind as a definite possibility. And then there was of course the visit to Mali
and the Ivory Coast that had struck a sensitive chord in my heart to reach out with
more intent to those who are shackled by Islamic bondage.
The Door to Côte
‘Ivoire closes
We were quite
dejected when the door to Côte ‘Ivoire closed so to speak in our faces. I had
already started to learn French for quite a few months. Thus I was quite shattered when a negative
reply came from there, although the principal of the mission school in Vavoua had
already told me there that the small institution had only limited dormitory
facilities and that they never had to cope with five children from the same
family. The age and number of our children militated against such a venture. That
our eldest son would have to return to Holland fairly soon after our arrival in
Côte ‘Ivoire, turned out to be quite decisive. But it was nevertheless a major
disappointment. I was not ready for a negative response from that quarter.
A Window opens
In his faithfulness the Lord intervened promptly hereafter. After the
very evening when Rosemarie and I specially prayed for our future ministry, we
received a completely unexpected phone call the next day. Totally out of the blue our friend Dick van
Stelten phoned from the tiny village of Josini in South Africa near to the
Mozambican border, challenging us to come and take over their work. That was
the Lord’s way of turning our attention to the country of my birth, so to speak
a renewed Macedonian call, on par with Pietie Orange’s letter.
Through a process of elimination we
had been guided to WEC International.
We decided to consult the Dutch WEC leaders, Jacob and Emmy Spronk. They were
very supportive, advising that we should go and explore the ministry to see if
the Lord confirmed any missionary outreach in Natal. Perhaps it could become a
new venture of WEC South Africa. (We were not aware of it that
WEC South Africa had actually decided not to start new ministries in the
country.)
My mother was due to turn eighty at
the end of that year and the golden wedding anniversary of my parents would shortly
thereafter in early January 1991. After all my international trips of the
previous months, we hardly had liberty to share our vision and intention with
other Christians to visit South Africa on orientation at the end of 1990. It
would be another faith venture. (Officially I was still unemployed, teaching Religious Instruction at Barthimeus, the local School for the
Blind very limitedly and doing some casual work with the East European Mission.)
Gradually one hurdle after the other
was surmounted as we decided to take our eldest and youngest child along on the
orientation journey to South Africa. We had no funds for such a trip. Rather
naively, the publication of my autobiographical material naturally came up for
consideration. Was it because of desperation that I had forgotten my intention
not to publish my autobiographical material abroad before having done so in Afrikaans
in my home country? Kok, a big publishing company in Kampen (Holland), however returned
the manuscript a few months later. With me being a completely unknown author,
they stated the obvious. There was no market in Holland for a translation of ‘What
God joined together.’
Our faith was really
tested as we prayed about going to serve in Northern Natal. In a TV programme
on Dutch TV the reporter mentioned that Natal at that time was worse than
Lebanon and Northern Ireland put together as a situation of civil war. Was this
the sort of situation we wanted to take our children into?
Seed starting to
germinate?
In obedience to the
Lord we nevertheless started to plan a visit to South Africa. In Pretoria we
hoped to visit Cees and Els Lugthart, a Dutch missionary couple linked to the Dorothea Mission. From there we hoped to
get to Josini in Northern Natal somehow.
Miraculously, sufficient funds came
in to book tickets for four of us – including Danny and Tabitha, our oldest and
youngest child - pay the fares, without having to get into debt or approaching
anybody. We were so happy to see how the Lord was teaching us to live by faith.
In fact, we also needed the fares for the ferry to take all of us plus our car
from Holland to England for our candidates’ orientation in January 1991. And then
there was the special 'fleece' – we needed a couple to pay our rent in Zeist
for six months. The Lord came through so wonderfully, answering our prayers!
In a few cases the seed of
confession I tried to sow over the years seemed to germinate. I really rejoiced
when I heard of Professor Willie Jonker’s[37]
bold stand in Rustenburg in November 1990. The government of the day and the
Afrikaans press slammed the Rustenburg confession in general, but in the
spiritual realm a deep impact was definitely made.
I had also started collating and
typing the reports of our previous visits to South Africa into an old computer
that I received via Peter Kalmijn. (He sold various computer parts which I had
found here and there. Thereafter he bought an old Personal Computer for me which
had a drive for ‘floppy discs’ from the proceeds. This PC served me for many a
year at the Cape. (Before that, I could only work on a PC at school or
university.) The manuscript was the intended present to my parents for their
golden wedding anniversary. David Appelo, a Dutch friend with a special
interest in South Africa whom I got to know through my Campus Crusade
activities, helped me a lot to get the material in a presentable form. The
result was Home or Hearth, the
narratives of our three previous visits to South Africa.
15.
Missionary Preparation
David Appelo felt
that we should try and publish the material in a form that would not be merely
a family record. Hesitantly, I agreed to allow him to revamp the manuscript for
wider publication. Our own family history was definitely the tone of a
manuscript that I had presented to my darling on her 40th birthday in July
1991.
Another Fleece
The procedure to
become WEC missionaries had been already well advanced when we became very
uncertain. What would happen if WEC
(Worldwide Evangelization for Christ) International turned us down or if we
decide not to join that agency after all? Then we would have been without any
accommodation. We knew how difficult it was to get housing in Holland even for
a couple or a small family. With our five kids, would such a step be
responsible? We decided to put out a ‘fleece’. If the Lord would give us people
who were willing to live in our home and pay the rent for the six months of our
missionary orientation, we would know that God confirmed our call.
We were brought in touch with a
couple where both of them had good jobs. (The circumstance however subsequently
became quite an issue when the couple did not pay the rent at all.)
A Cloud over our
Acceptance as WEC Missionaries
It was like coming home when we arrived at the WEC headquarters in
Durban in December 1990. However, my activism soon brought me into hot water
there. As the 16th of December approached, I felt constrained to
write a letter to President De Klerk, Mr Nelson Mandela and Chief Buthelezi,
the three main political role players at the time, suggesting to them to take a
bold step in reconciliation. In fact, in my draft letter I suggested the
traditional ‘Day of the Covenant’ to be renamed under this banner.
This led to a major
upheaval when I showed my draft letter to the acting leader of WEC in South
Africa. He stressed that it was WEC policy to ‘stay out of politics.’ I
disagreed, because my intended plan of action was not meddling in politics. I
regarded it as a biblical injunction to be an agent of reconciliation.
Nevertheless, I refrained from posting the letters. But I was thrown into an
inner turmoil once again. There was suddenly a big cloud over our joining WEC.
Come January 1991, we
were already in England at Bulstrode, the headquarters of WEC for the
candidates’ orientation course. Soon after our arrival there, I shared my
reservations with Howard Sayers, our Candidate Secretary. He suggested that I
speak to our international leader, and especially to Patrick Johnstone, who had
been working with the Dorothea Mission
in Southern Africa. After speaking to these people, we had liberty to complete
the four months of the Candidate
Orientation Course in England.
Another Treatise
Writing
remained my hobby for many years. Yet another treatise followed as a result of
further studies. It was a missiological work describing the new South Africa as
a ‘goldmine’ for the recruitment of missionaries. After I presented it to the
international leaders of WEC the response was lukewarm, not encouraging enough
to proceed with publication. I decided to leave it at that. I loved writing and
researching. I dearly wanted to put the results in the service of the Lord, but
I definitely did not want to waste money to get books printed that would hardly
be read. The Lord would have to confirm any possible publication.
Lessons in
Spiritual Warfare
The Lord used the
time at Bulstrode to start moulding us for our future ministry in Cape Town.
Here I was clearly introduced to the concept of spiritual warfare in a new way.
Never before had I heard about things like prayer walks, although we already
had ample practice in some areas of strategic and targeted prayer, without
giving them fancy names.
The Gulf War at the beginning of
1991 made things very practical. In one of the devotionals one of the workers
at the WEC international office demonstrated why it was necessary for the
allied airplanes to prepare the area for the artillery. Using the same idea,
C.T. Studd, the founder of WEC, had used terms like ‘chocolate soldier’ and ‘prayer
batteries’ many years ago. But that sounded like language of a bygone age. The
purpose of Studd’s concept would prepare the ‘soil’ of the fields before the soldier
troops would move in as missionaries. (Studd was of course very much influenced
by William Booth and his Salvation Army.)
I could have known more about
spiritual warfare because Count Zinzendorf, the founder of the renewed Moravian Church, had introduced a term
like ‘Streiterehe’ - the warrior marriage - centuries ago. (According to
this concept the married partners sacrificed to be separated from the spouse
for extended periods for the sake of the Gospel.) But all this I had been
perceiving as not valid for our time.
At Bulstrode things changed when not
only the Gulf War made matters very practical, but fundamentalist Islam also
became ever more clearly visible as a threat to world peace. At the Second International Congress on World Evangelization in Manila in 1989 spiritual warfare had come into the foreground quite
forcefully. What a special privilege it was to have lecturers such as Patrick
Johnstone and Dieter Kuhl, who were at the cutting edge of worldwide
developments. We profited immensely from this new missions focus at Bulstrode.
As part of our
missionary training in England we had to write an assignment, a ‘field study’
about the country where we intended to go to. I had already been giving talks
about different aspects of South African life. But I wanted to know more about
the culture and history of the Indian population of the country. What also
played a role in my thinking was the strategy to be used back home to help
recruit South African Indians for the subcontinent from where their ancestors
originally had come. As a mission agency we were seeing this as one of the
possibilities of solving the problem of entry into India as career
missionaries. Thus my suggestion was that Rosemarie could study the politics,
economy and related issues about South Africa, while I would make a study of
the history and culture of South African Indians. This brought me to some study
of Hinduism and Islam, their two major religions. My experience in West Africa
also definitely influenced me. I now thought of Black South Africans as
potential missionaries to the Muslim countries of West Africa.
Tests of Faith
In Bulstrode our faith in the provision
for daily needs was tested to the full when our rent in Holland had to be paid
while we were also required to trust the Lord for the means to live at the WEC
International Headquarters. Matters came to a head when the couple staying in
our home did not honour their commitment. At this time we were furthermore told
that we had to return about 3000 guilders rental subsidy from the Dutch
government.
We were challenged to take Hebrews 10:34 literally,
allowing ourselves to be ‘robbed’ innocently. Just at this time, we received
more or less the same amount from the Dutch tax office. We duly paid the subsidy
money using this, although we were really living from hand to mouth.
Differences
with the WEC Leadership
During my superficial
study of Islam in South Africa at Bulstrode, I had already deduced that
Bo-Kaap, the residential area below Signal Hill, had become predominantly Islamic.
I discerned that some spiritual warfare might be needed to tackle this. When we
returned to Holland from England, I challenged the
Christians there to send their ‘prayer batteries’ to Bo-Kaap, to bombard the
area - before we as missionaries could go there as the ‘infantry’. (I was not
aware of it that the Society of
International Ministries (SIM)[38]
was already active there. We had no concrete plans for involvement there in Bo-Kaap
as yet. In our correspondence with WEC South Africa we did mention however that
we wanted our hands free to evangelize among the Muslims. But the South African
WEC leadership desperately wanted to use us for representation in the Western
Cape. The stated strategy of WEC in SA was to focus on recruitment, and not to
get involved with new ministries.
Perceived differences with the new
WEC leadership in South Africa with regard to our future role clouded our start
at Emmeloord, the Dutch HQ, where we were due to be for two months of further
missionary candidate orientation. We decided
to defer our acceptance as WEC missionaries, but to continue with the procedure
to return to South Africa. Thankfully all the differences could be resolved. It
was finally agreed that we would help our colleague Shirley Charlton with
representation in Cape Town in the first year and thereafter we were open to
see how the Lord would lead.
Financial Vindication
Expensive phone calls to
Holland to the couple that were living in our home on Broederplein in Zeist were
of no avail. The calls merely harvested empty promises. We now however
experienced one miracle after the other. We were enabled to pay our rent in Zeist
and also for our stay in England and in Emmeloord at the Dutch WEC headquarters
over a period of six months.
Another high hurdle would have been
the airfare to South Africa for us as a couple plus our five children, of which
two had to pay adult fares. We had also decided that a container would be the
best way to get our personal possessions to Cape Town. That was not cheap.
After applying the principle
of Matthew 18 to deal with a conflict, we got the pastor of the couple that lived in our house for six months involved..They finally paid the rent in a lump sum. Now we had the money not only for
our airfare, but also for the container in which we wanted to transport our
furniture and other belongings. All in all this was a big learning curve to
trust the Lord for finances, without appealing for funds. We appreciate this
pillar of the WEC ethos very much. We stuck to this principle ever since.
[1] Later the
pervasive replacement theology that is still keeping Judaism and the Jews
side-lined also came into focus as something for which the Church universal
should repent. (According to the replacement theory the Church is the ‘new
Israel’, substituting the old nation that was elected by God to be a blessing
to the nations.)
[2] These manuscripts can now be found on our internet blog, www.isaacandishmael.blogspot.com.
Someone helped me in 2008 to create a blog where I dropped my mauscripts.
Subsequently I have been improving them one after the other.
[3] Richard
Dudley demonstrated how the bubbling former ‘slum area’ functioned as the
cradle of ‘a national solution for all of South Africa and the structures and
ideas upon which a truly national liberation movement came to be based.’ In
similar vein, Yousuf Rassool referred to the Freedom Charter of the ANC as ‘nothing but an imitation in many
respects of our Ten Point Plan’, i.e. that of the Unity Movement. If one considers the similarity between the Freedom
Charter and the People’s Charter of June 1948, they display indeed
great similarity.
[4] Bo-Kaap is the
cradle of Islam in South Africa. In my childhood it was however already a predominantly
Christian residential area, in spite of a few mosques and the Schotse Kloof flats that had been
specially built for Muslims in the late 1930s. Through apartheid-related Group
Areas legistation Bo-Kaap became almost exclusively Islamic.
[5] Originally Engel (meaning angel) was a German name and Joemat was a
slave name.
[6] One of the first group of German (Special) students, my student
colleagues of 1965, was Jakes Gerwel, who later became the Rector of the
University. President Mandela chose him to become his close aid in the first
ANC government. Tony Links, another student collegue and later also a teacher
colleague in Bellville South, went to high honours until he finally became the
Registrar of the prestigious University
of South Africa, UNISA.
[7] Later my programme was changed to a single year, a practical year with
the Evangelische Jungmännerwerk in Stuttgart.
[8] I took the
latter subject by correspondence with UNISA in Pretoria.
[9] Our property in Tiervlei that
consisted of eight big adjacent plots, had more or less
been expropriated under the guise of slum clearance. My parents were given a
pittance for it. A few years later a shopping centre was erected on the
premises.
[10] As Christians we have been referring to the Hebrew Bible as the 'Old
Testament', a term Jews consider denigrating. I try to avoid the term because
of the substituting connotations. It somehow creates the impression that the
'New Testament' ('NT') more or less replaced the 'Old Testament'. For lack of a
better term (Jewish scholars sometime refer to the 'NT' as Christian
Scriptures, but that terminology does not sound to me accurate enough), I
continue to use 'NT', i.e. putting NT in inverted comma‘s.
[11] Rev. Goba later became a theological professor at UNISA next to high
office in his denomination.
[12] In recent years the building complex was renovated and
changed to house the City’s Library.
[13] A fuller report of our visits to
South Africa can be found in Home or Hearth or Involuntary Exile.
[14] In 2001, the MRA movement changed its name yet again, to Initiatives
of Change (IofC).
[15] The Moravian Church in South
Africa had two ‘provinces’. The division in the West, which consisted
predominantly of Cape ‘Coloureds’, was called the Broederkerk.
[16] ‘Zieltjes winnen’ in Dutch has quite a
negative connotation in Dutch and giving one’s testimony is known as ‘getuigen’. Jehovah’s Witnesses are also
known as Jehovah’s ‘Getuigen’.
[17] In the church council there were in fact more females than brothers.
[18] The title alludes to one of the biblical Beatitudes,
Matthew 5:6. Geregtigheid in
Afrikaans has the double meaning of righteousness and justice.
[19] In 2001, the MRA movement changed its name yet again, to Initiatives
of Change (IofC).
[20] A fuller report of the visit to South Africa can be found in Home
or Hearth/ Involuntary Exile.
[21] Dr O'Brien Geldenhuys and Professor Willie Jonker
completed the delegation. These three clergymen would be quite influential to
bring about significant changes in the Dutch
Reformed Church in the years hereafter.
[22] I thought to have discerned some influence of Honger na Geregtigheid when I read about an open letter that Dr
Boesak wrote to Dr Schlebusch, a Cabinet Minister. Later he openly clashed with
Bishop Tutu because of the willingness of the Anglican bishop to continue
talking to Prime Minister Botha.
[23] Later I discovered that
the letter, written under a pseudonym, was distorted to such an extent that one
could hardly recognize the original.
[24] Translation: Love drives out fear
[25] Jakes had become quite an ecumenical figure since
our days in the Student Christian
Association through which we had met. He had been a member of the Christian Institute almost since its
inception and later he did some spadework with Dr Beyers Naudé for the erection
of the Broederkring. In this organization ministers of the Black
(non-White) Dutch Reformed churches
met informally for fellowship. Looking back, the
strategy was flawed to a
great extent because the opposition to apartheid and racial discrimination was
central in the Broederkring, instead of the unity in Christ.
[26] Blacks were only allowed to be in the ‘White’
cities and towns under restricted conditions.
[27] I did not experience this as a tragedy though.
I was merely enquiring to test the waters after the repeal of the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act in
1985. It was in my view more of a case of wanting to see if the coast was clear
to make concrete plans for a return to South Africa.
[28] The premises of 33 Haywood Road in Crawford were very much involved in
this saga.
[29] I continued
working at the original Honger na Geregtigheid. To this end my daughter scanned the A4 version in. At the end of
December 2016 I discovered that the copy in my possession was actually
incomplete. I nevertheless pasted it on the Internet at www.isaacandishmael.blogspot.com. I had no liberty
and drive however to do more work on As
die Here die Huis nie bou nie en Sonder
my kan julle niks doen nie, the other two originally planned components
of Honger na
Geregtigheid. However,
I took a rebuke to heart, starting to work seriously on the present
manuscript.
[30] The actions in Crossroads, KTC and Nyanga
played a significant role as part of the run-up to the repeal of influx
legislation. In 1985 the relevant act was
scrapped.
[31] I also had not discerned clearly yet how
Constantine had possibly unintentionally high-jacked the Church on this score,
estranging us from our Jewish roots.
[32] A Huis van Bewaring
is a sort of prison,
where inmates are incarcerated who had committed less serious crimes. There I
participated in a weekly conversational group, led by Ds Ter Haar Romeny, who
also had contacts to South Africa.
[33] Sister Kooy was also involved in the evangelical movement of Holland
since the Second World War when they were caring for the persecuted Jews and
for the destitute, led by famous Dutch people like Corrie ten Boom and Brother
Jan Kits (sn).
[34] The Dutch word Kruistochten means crusades.
[35] Soon thereafter we bought a second hand TV for 50 guilders that we
left in Holland when we came to South Africa in 1992.
[36] Campus Crusade subsequently changed their name in Holland to Agape.
[37] He was one of the group of clergymen whom I had met on Schiphol
airport in 1979.
[38] The mission
agency was formerly called Sudan Interior Mission and Serving
in Mission is the
current name.
[1] Later the
pervasive replacement theology that is still keeping Judaism and the Jews
side-lined also came into focus as something for which the Church universal
should repent. (According to the replacement theory the Church is the ‘new
Israel’, substituting the old nation that was elected by God to be a blessing
to the nations.)
[2] These manuscripts can now be found on our internet blog, www.isaacandishmael.blogspot.com.
Someone helped me in 2008 to create a blog where I dropped my mauscripts.
Subsequently I have been improving them one after the other.
[3] Richard
Dudley demonstrated how the bubbling former ‘slum area’ functioned as the
cradle of ‘a national solution for all of South Africa and the structures and
ideas upon which a truly national liberation movement came to be based.’ In
similar vein, Yousuf Rassool referred to the Freedom Charter of the ANC as ‘nothing but an imitation in many
respects of our Ten Point Plan’, i.e. that of the Unity Movement. If one considers the similarity between the Freedom
Charter and the People’s Charter of June 1948, they display indeed
great similarity.
[4] Bo-Kaap is the
cradle of Islam in South Africa. In my childhood it was however already a predominantly
Christian residential area, in spite of a few mosques and the Schotse Kloof flats that had been
specially built for Muslims in the late 1930s. Through apartheid-related Group
Areas legistation Bo-Kaap became almost exclusively Islamic.
[5] Originally Engel (meaning angel) was a German name and Joemat was a
slave name.
[6] One of the first group of German (Special) students, my student
colleagues of 1965, was Jakes Gerwel, who later became the Rector of the
University. President Mandela chose him to become his close aid in the first
ANC government. Tony Links, another student collegue and later also a teacher
colleague in Bellville South, went to high honours until he finally became the
Registrar of the prestigious University
of South Africa, UNISA.
[7] Later my programme was changed to a single year, a practical year with
the Evangelische Jungmännerwerk in Stuttgart.
[8] I took the
latter subject by correspondence with UNISA in Pretoria.
[9] Our property in Tiervlei that
consisted of eight big adjacent plots, had more or less
been expropriated under the guise of slum clearance. My parents were given a
pittance for it. A few years later a shopping centre was erected on the
premises.
[10] As Christians we have been referring to the Hebrew Bible as the 'Old
Testament', a term Jews consider denigrating. I try to avoid the term because
of the substituting connotations. It somehow creates the impression that the
'New Testament' ('NT') more or less replaced the 'Old Testament'. For lack of a
better term (Jewish scholars sometime refer to the 'NT' as Christian
Scriptures, but that terminology does not sound to me accurate enough), I
continue to use 'NT', i.e. putting NT in inverted comma‘s.
[11] Rev. Goba later became a theological professor at UNISA next to high
office in his denomination.
[12] In recent years the building complex was renovated and
changed to house the City’s Library.
[13] A fuller report of our visits to
South Africa can be found in Home or Hearth or Involuntary Exile.
[14] In 2001, the MRA movement changed its name yet again, to Initiatives
of Change (IofC).
[15] The Moravian Church in South
Africa had two ‘provinces’. The division in the West, which consisted
predominantly of Cape ‘Coloureds’, was called the Broederkerk.
[16] ‘Zieltjes winnen’ in Dutch has quite a
negative connotation in Dutch and giving one’s testimony is known as ‘getuigen’. Jehovah’s Witnesses are also
known as Jehovah’s ‘Getuigen’.
[17] In the church council there were in fact more females than brothers.
[18] The title alludes to one of the biblical Beatitudes,
Matthew 5:6. Geregtigheid in
Afrikaans has the double meaning of righteousness and justice.
[19] In 2001, the MRA movement changed its name yet again, to Initiatives
of Change (IofC).
[20] A fuller report of the visit to South Africa can be found in Home
or Hearth/ Involuntary Exile.
[21] Dr O'Brien Geldenhuys and Professor Willie Jonker
completed the delegation. These three clergymen would be quite influential to
bring about significant changes in the Dutch
Reformed Church in the years hereafter.
[22] I thought to have discerned some influence of Honger na Geregtigheid when I read about an open letter that Dr
Boesak wrote to Dr Schlebusch, a Cabinet Minister. Later he openly clashed with
Bishop Tutu because of the willingness of the Anglican bishop to continue
talking to Prime Minister Botha.
[23] Later I discovered that
the letter, written under a pseudonym, was distorted to such an extent that one
could hardly recognize the original.
[24] Translation: Love drives out fear
[25] Jakes had become quite an ecumenical figure since
our days in the Student Christian
Association through which we had met. He had been a member of the Christian Institute almost since its
inception and later he did some spadework with Dr Beyers Naudé for the erection
of the Broederkring. In this organization ministers of the Black
(non-White) Dutch Reformed churches
met informally for fellowship. Looking back, the
strategy was flawed to a
great extent because the opposition to apartheid and racial discrimination was
central in the Broederkring, instead of the unity in Christ.
[26] Blacks were only allowed to be in the ‘White’
cities and towns under restricted conditions.
[27] I did not experience this as a tragedy though.
I was merely enquiring to test the waters after the repeal of the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act in
1985. It was in my view more of a case of wanting to see if the coast was clear
to make concrete plans for a return to South Africa.
[28] The premises of 33 Haywood Road in Crawford were very much involved in
this saga.
[29] I continued
working at the original Honger na Geregtigheid. To this end my daughter scanned the A4 version in. At the end of
December 2016 I discovered that the copy in my possession was actually
incomplete. I nevertheless pasted it on the Internet at www.isaacandishmael.blogspot.com. I had no liberty
and drive however to do more work on As
die Here die Huis nie bou nie en Sonder
my kan julle niks doen nie, the other two originally planned components
of Honger na
Geregtigheid. However,
I took a rebuke to heart, starting to work seriously on the present
manuscript.
[30] The actions in Crossroads, KTC and Nyanga
played a significant role as part of the run-up to the repeal of influx
legislation. In 1985 the relevant act was
scrapped.
[31] I also had not discerned clearly yet how
Constantine had possibly unintentionally high-jacked the Church on this score,
estranging us from our Jewish roots.
[32] A Huis van Bewaring
is a sort of prison,
where inmates are incarcerated who had committed less serious crimes. There I
participated in a weekly conversational group, led by Ds Ter Haar Romeny, who
also had contacts to South Africa.
[33] Sister Kooy was also involved in the evangelical movement of Holland
since the Second World War when they were caring for the persecuted Jews and
for the destitute, led by famous Dutch people like Corrie ten Boom and Brother
Jan Kits (sn).
[34] The Dutch word Kruistochten means crusades.
[35] Soon thereafter we bought a second hand TV for 50 guilders that we
left in Holland when we came to South Africa in 1992.
[36] Campus Crusade subsequently changed their name in Holland to Agape.
[37] He was one of the group of clergymen whom I had met on Schiphol
airport in 1979.
[38] The mission
agency was formerly called Sudan Interior Mission and Serving
in Mission is the
current name.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home